留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

冷却流量偏差对超燃冲压发动机飞行速域影响

姜俞光 戚永健 段艳娟 鲍文 范玮

姜俞光, 戚永健, 段艳娟, 等. 冷却流量偏差对超燃冲压发动机飞行速域影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(1):20230107 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20230107
引用本文: 姜俞光, 戚永健, 段艳娟, 等. 冷却流量偏差对超燃冲压发动机飞行速域影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(1):20230107 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20230107
JIANG Yuguang, QI Yongjian, DUAN Yanjuan, et al. Effect of cooling flow deviation on flight velocity region of scramjet[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(1):20230107 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20230107
Citation: JIANG Yuguang, QI Yongjian, DUAN Yanjuan, et al. Effect of cooling flow deviation on flight velocity region of scramjet[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(1):20230107 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20230107

冷却流量偏差对超燃冲压发动机飞行速域影响

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20230107
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(51906207,U22B2091)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    姜俞光(1990-),男,副教授,博士,主要从事超燃冲压发动机/爆震发动机先进冷却技术等方面的研究工作。E-mail:jiangyuguang@nwpu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: V233.5

Effect of cooling flow deviation on flight velocity region of scramjet

  • 摘要:

    针对碳氢燃料流量偏差问题对超燃冲压发动机马赫数许用上限影响的问题,建立准一维燃烧与冷却耦合模型,同时对其进行了验证,作为总体分析工具;仿真结果表明:超燃冲压发动机工作范围受流量偏差的影响,以流量偏差β=−0.5为例,流量偏差将使得发动机飞行马赫数上限从Ma=6降低至Ma=5,说明流量偏差将严重限制发动机的安全运行速域,影响飞行任务;通过对比分析不同燃烧与冷却设计,如逆流冷却、两点喷油、偏差起始位置、最大许用壁温/油温等,对飞行马赫数上限的影响机制,发现其可减弱流量偏差,拓宽发动机工作范围;最后基于分级节流流量偏差抑制方法的试验数据,分析了此方法拓宽发动机工作范围的能力,发动机工作速域上限整体拓宽接近1个马赫数范围。

     

  • 图 1  HyShot Ⅱ飞行试验燃烧室通道示意图[54](单位:m)

    Figure 1.  Schematic diagram of the experimental HyShot Ⅱ combustion duct[54] (unit:m)

    图 2  飞行试验[54]和仿真结果对比

    Figure 2.  Pressure comparisons between flight data from [54] and current result

    图 3  正癸烷温度与热沉关系的对比验证

    Figure 3.  Verification of heat sink characteristics of n-decane

    图 4  管外壁温度对比验证

    Figure 4.  Verification of outside wall temperature along flowing direction

    图 5  燃烧室构型

    Figure 5.  Configuration of combustor

    图 6  冷却燃料流量偏差对发动机工作边界的影响

    Figure 6.  Operational boundaries under different fuel flow deviations

    图 7  冷却燃料流量偏差对壁温分布影响

    Figure 7.  Wall temperature distribution under fuel mal-distribution

    图 8  燃料流量偏差对转化率分布的影响

    Figure 8.  Fuel conversion rate distribution under fuel mal-distribution

    图 9  冷却燃料流量随偏差系数β的变化

    Figure 9.  Variation of cooling fuel mass flow rate versus β

    图 10  顺/逆流冷设置下发动机工作边界

    Figure 10.  Operational boundaries under counter/parallel cooling setup

    图 11  顺/逆流冷却时壁温和油温分布

    Figure 11.  Wall and fuel temperature distributions with parallel/counter cooling

    图 12  顺/逆流冷却时热流分布

    Figure 12.  Heat flux distributions with parallel/counter cooling

    图 13  不同流量偏差条件下顺/逆流冷却壁温分布

    Figure 13.  Wall temperature in parallel/counter cooling under different flow deviation conditions

    图 14  逆流冷却$ {\Delta }{{T}}_{\rm{counter}} $与顺流冷却$ {\Delta }{{T}}_{\rm{parallel}} $之比

    Figure 14.  Ratio of counter cooling $ {\Delta }{{T}}_{\rm{counter}} $ to parallel cooling $ {\Delta }{{T}}_{\rm{parallel}} $

    图 15  逆流冷却热流与顺流冷却热流之比

    Figure 15.  Ratio of counter cooling heat flow to parallel cooling heat flow

    图 16  不同飞行马赫数时燃烧室沿程总温变化

    Figure 16.  Total temperature in the combustor versus Mach number

    图 17  不同Dstart下的壁温峰值

    Figure 17.  Maximum wall temperature under different Dstart

    图 18  顺流冷却壁温/油温分布

    Figure 18.  Wall/fuel temperature distribution under parallel cooling

    图 19  顺流冷却燃料转化率分布

    Figure 19.  Fuel conversion rate distribution under parallel cooling

    图 20  逆流冷却壁温/油温分布

    Figure 20.  Wall/fuel temperature distribution under counter cooling

    图 21  逆流冷却燃料转化率分布

    Figure 21.  Fuel conversion rate distribution under counter cooling

    图 22  两点喷油时流量偏差对发动机工作边界影响

    Figure 22.  Operational boundaries under double-point injection

    图 23  不同喷油方式下温度分布情况

    Figure 23.  Temperature distributions under different injection schemes

    图 24  不同喷油方式下热流分布情况

    Figure 24.  Heat flux distributions under different injection schemes

    图 25  不同壁面许用温度下发动机工作边界

    Figure 25.  Operational boundaries under different solid temperature limits

    图 26  流量偏差抑制对于发动机工作边界的拓展

    Figure 26.  Expansion of engine operational boundary by controlling the flow rate deviation

    表  1  燃烧室入口条件

    Table  1.   Inlet conditions of combustor

    参数 Ma=5 Ma=5.5 Ma=6 Ma=6.5 Ma=7
    进口马赫数Main 2.4 2.7 3 3.25 3.5
    进口总压pt_in/MPa 1.35 1.91 2.73 3.82 5.26
    进口总温Tt_in/K 1217.1 1433.5 1680.0 2102.8 2413.6
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  燃料温度对发动机速域限制作用

    Table  2.   Effect of fuel temperature limit on the upper flight Mach number limit

    当量比 碳氢燃料最高温度/K
    Ma=5
    β=−0.3)
    Ma=5.5
    β=0)
    Ma=5
    β=0)
    1 896.66 897.80 862.10
    0.9 904.03 904.06 865.23
    0.8 916.04 913.94 869.13
    0.7 940.23 931.92 874.52
    0.6 979.13 882.98
    0.5 899.12
    0.4 950.12
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] CURRAN E T. Scramjet engines: the first forty years[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power,2001,17(6): 1138-1148. doi: 10.2514/2.5875
    [2] GASCOIN N,GILLARD P,MANGEOT A,et al. Literature survey for a first choice of a fuel-oxidiser couple for hybrid propulsion based on kinetic justifications[J]. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis,2012,94: 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2011.11.006
    [3] ZHANG Duo,YANG Shengbo,ZHANG Silong,et al. Thermodynamic analysis on optimum performance of scramjet engine at high Mach numbers[J]. Energy,2015,90: 1046-1054. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.08.017
    [4] YANG Qingchun,CHETEHOUNA K,GASCOIN N,et al. Experimental study on combustion modes and thrust performance of a staged-combustor of the scramjet with dual-strut[J]. Acta Astronautica,2016,122: 28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.01.002
    [5] YANG Qingchun,BAO Wen,CHETEHOUNA K,et al. Thermal behavior of an isolator with mode transition inducing back-pressure of a dual-mode scramjet[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics,2017,30(2): 595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2017.02.013
    [6] ZHANG Duo,FENG Yu,ZHANG Silong,et al. Quasi-one-dimensional model of scramjet combustor coupled with regenerative cooling[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power,2016,32(3): 687-697. doi: 10.2514/1.B35887
    [7] TADDEO L,GASCOIN N,FEDIOUN I,et al. Dimensioning of automated regenerative cooling: setting of high-end experiment[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology,2015,43: 350-359. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2015.03.015
    [8] TADDEO L,GASCOIN N,CHETEHOUNA K,et al. Experimental study of pyrolysis-combustion coupling in a regeneratively cooled combustor: system dynamics analysis[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology,2017,67: 473-483. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2017.04.026
    [9] FENG Yu,QIN Jiang,ZHANG Silong,et al. Modeling and analysis of heat and mass transfers of supercritical hydrocarbon fuel with pyrolysis in mini-channel[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2015,91: 520-531. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.07.095
    [10] LIU Shuyuan,FENG Yu,CAO Yong,et al. Numerical simulation of supercritical catalytic steam reforming of aviation kerosene coupling with coking and heat transfer in mini-channel[J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences,2019,137: 199-214. doi: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2018.10.039
    [11] ZHU Yinhai,LIU Bo,JIANG Peixue. Experimental and numerical investigations on n-decane thermal cracking at supercritical pressures in a vertical tube[J]. Energy & Fuels,2014,28(1): 466-474.
    [12] XU Keke,MENG Hua. Modeling and simulation of supercritical-pressure turbulent heat transfer of aviation kerosene with detailed pyrolytic chemical reactions[J]. Energy and Fuels,2015,29(7): 4137-4149. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00097
    [13] FU Yanchen,TAO Zhi,XU Guoqiang,et al. Experimental study of flow distribution for aviation kerosene in parallel helical tubes under supercritical pressure[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering,2015,90: 102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.06.082
    [14] CHEN Yu,WANG Yu,BAO Zewei,et al. Numerical investigation of flow distribution and heat transfer of hydrocarbon fuel in regenerative cooling panel[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering,2016,98: 628-635. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.12.088
    [15] QIN Jiang,JIANG Yuguang,FENG Yu,et al. Flow rate distribution of cracked hydrocarbon fuel in parallel pipes[J]. Fuel,2015,161: 105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.08.015
    [16] JIANG Yuguang,ZHANG Silong,FENG Yu,et al. A control method for flow rate distribution of cracked hydrocarbon fuel in parallel channels[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering,2016,105: 531-536. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.03.031
    [17] LI Chaolong,XIA Zhixun,MA Likun,et al. Performance analysis on the specific impulse and specific thrust of scramjet with a quasi-one-dimensional model[J]. Energy,2023,267: 126400. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126400
    [18] VANYAI T,BRICALLI M,BRIESCHENK S,et al. Scramjet performance for ideal combustion processes[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology,2018,75: 215-226. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2017.12.021
    [19] LI Xiaojie,HUANG Xiaobin,LIU Hong,et al. Fuel reactivity controlled self-starting and propulsion performance of a scramjet: a model investigation[J]. Energy,2020,195: 116920. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.116920
    [20] LI Chaolong,XIA Zhixun,MA Likun,et al. Performance evaluation for scramjet based on ground direct-connected test: a method investigation[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology,2021,117: 106895. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.106895
    [21] HAN Wanzhi,WEI Zhijun,YANG Guang,et al. Numerical study on long-duration performance of solid-fuel scramjet with size-fixed aft channel[J]. Acta Astronautica,2021,189: 222-234. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.08.048
    [22] BARPANDE G,SINGH A,PAVITHRAN S. Using numerical simulation to investigate the effect of injection configurations over the scramjet performance[J]. Materials Today: Proceedings,2021,46: 4537-4545. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.703
    [23] SHARMA V,ESWARAN V,CHAKRABORTY D. Effect of fuel-jet injection angle variation on the overall performance of a scramjet engine[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology,2020,100: 105786. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2020.105786
    [24] YARASAI S S,RAVI D,YOGANAND S,et al. Numerical investigation on the performance and combustion characteristics of a cavity based scramjet combustor with novel strut injectors[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2023,48(14): 5681-5695. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.150
    [25] LIU Mingjiang,SUN Mingbo,ZHAO Guoyan,et al. Effect of combustion mode on thrust performance in a symmetrical tandem-cavity scramjet combustor[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology,2022,130: 107904. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2022.107904
    [26] VERMA K A,PANDEY K M,RAY M,et al. The numerical investigation of combustion performance of scramjet combustor with variation in angle of attack[J]. Results in Engineering,2022,15: 100507. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100507
    [27] DENG H W,ZHU K,XU G Q,et al. Isobaric specific heat capacity measurement for kerosene RP-3 in the near-critical and supercritical regions[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data,2012,57(2): 263-268.
    [28] DENG H W,ZHANG C B,XU G Q,et al. Density measurements of endothermic hydrocarbon fuel at sub- and supercritical conditions[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data,2011,56(6): 2980-2986.
    [29] XU G Q,JIA Z X,WEN J,et al. Thermal-conductivity measurements of aviation kerosene RP-3 from (285 to 513)K at sub- and supercritical pressures[J]. International Journal of Thermophysics,2015,36(4): 620-632. doi: 10.1007/s10765-015-1840-4
    [30] DENG H W,ZHANG C B,XU G Q,et al. Viscosity measurements of endothermic hydrocarbon fuel from (298 to 788) K under supercritical pressure conditions[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data,2012,57(2): 358-365.
    [31] CISMONDI M,MOLLERUP J. Development and application of a three-parameter RK-PR equation of state[J]. Fluid Phase Equilibria,2005,232(1/2): 74-89.
    [32] MENG Hua,YANG V. A unified treatment of general fluid thermodynamics and its application to a preconditioning scheme[J]. Journal of Computational Physics,2003,189(1): 277-304. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00211-0
    [33] MICHAEL S. GRABOSKI,T E. DAUBERT. A modified soave equation of state for phase equilibrium calculations: I hydrocarbon systems [J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development 1980 19(3): 501-505.
    [34] ZHU Yinhai,PENG Wei,XU Ruina,et al. Review on active thermal protection and its heat transfer for airbreathing hypersonic vehicles[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics,2018,31(10): 1929-1953. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2018.06.011
    [35] JIANG Peixue,LU Zelong,GUO Yuxuan,et al. Experimental investigation of convective heat transfer of hydrocarbon fuels at supercritical pressures within rotating centrifugal channel[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering,2019,147: 101-112. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.10.039
    [36] YANG Chengang,HAN Huaizhi,ZHU Quan,et al. Cracking and buoyancy effect on hydrocarbon endothermic and heat transfer characteristics in rectangular mini-channel[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering,2023,56: 242-254. doi: 10.1016/j.cjche.2022.07.024
    [37] WU Panxi,DAI Yitong,DU Tong,et al. The pyrolysis kinetics and heat exchange performance of biomass hydrocarbon pinane[J]. Fuel,2022,317: 123453. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123453
    [38] LI Zaizheng,LI Ya,ZHANG Xiangwen,et al. Coupling of pyrolysis and heat transfer of supercritical hydrocarbon fuel in rectangular minichannels[J]. Chemical Engineering Science,2022,247: 116924. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2021.116924
    [39] JING Tingting,HE Guoqiang,QIN Fei,et al. An innovative self-adaptive method for improving heat sink utilization efficiency of hydrocarbon fuel in regenerative thermal protection system of combined cycle engine[J]. Energy Conversion and Management,2018,178: 369-382. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.10.038
    [40] CHEN Yu,LIU Bin,LEI Zhiliang,et al. A control method for flow distribution in fuel-cooled plate based on choked flow effect[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering,2018,142: 127-137. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.06.065
    [41] SHEN Wenhao,CHEN Yu,JIANG Jin,et al. Study on non-monotonic pressure-drop of supercritical n-decane with pyrolysis in heated channels[J]. Fuel,2023,332: 126138. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126138
    [42] JIANG Yuguang,XU Yaxing,ZHANG Silong,et al. Parametric study on the distribution of flow rate and heat sink utilization in cooling channels of advanced aero-engines[J]. Energy,2017,138: 1056-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.091
    [43] JIANG Yuguang,QIN Jiang,CHETEHOUNA K,et al. Parametric study on the hydrocarbon fuel flow rate distribution and cooling effect in non-uniformly heated parallel cooling channels[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2018,126: 267-276. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.05.124
    [44] JIANG Yuguang,XU Yaxing,QIN Jiang,et al. The flow rate distribution of hydrocarbon fuel in parallel channels with different cross section shapes[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering,2018,137: 173-183. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.03.033
    [45] JIANG Yuguang,QIN Jiang,XU Yaxing,et al. The influences of variable sectional area design on improving the hydrocarbon fuel flow distribution in parallel channels under supercritical pressure[J]. Fuel,2018,233: 442-453. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.06.082
    [46] JIANG Yuguang,QIN Jiang,CHETEHOUNA K,et al. Effect of geometry parameters on the hydrocarbon fuel flow rate distribution in pyrolysis zone of scramjet cooling channels[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer,2019,141: 1114-1130. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.07.054
    [47] JIANG Yuguang,WANG Qi,ZHANG Duo,et al. One-dimensional modelling and simulation of multiple solution characteristics of hydrocarbon fuel flow excursion in scramjet parallel cooling channels[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering,2023,221: 119757. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119757
    [48] ANDERSON J. Computational fluid dynamics-the basics with applications [M]. 1st ed. New York: McGraw-Hill,1995.
    [49] RICHARD J C. Unsteady quasi-one-dimensional nonlinear dynamic model of supersonic through-flow fan surge[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power,2006,22(1): 188-196. doi: 10.2514/1.14332
    [50] GAMEZO V,ORAN E. Flame acceleration in narrow tubes: effect of wall temperature on propulsion characteristics : AIAA2006-1134[R]. Reston,US: AIAA,2006.
    [51] MITANI T,TOMIOKA S,KANDA T,et al. Scramjet performance achieved in engine tests from M4 to M8 flight conditions: AIAA2003-7009[R]. Reston,US: AIAA,2003.
    [52] HEISER W,PRATT D,DALEY D,et al. Hypersonic Airbreathing Propulsion[M]. Washington DC: AIAA Incorporation,1994.
    [53] WEN Bao,HONG Xiao,TAO Cui. Research on optimal regulating rule for scramjet control: AIAA2006-8026 [R]. Reston,US: AIAA,2006.
    [54] SMART M K,HASS N E,PAULL A. Flight data analysis of the HyShot 2 scramjet flight experiment[J]. AIAA Journal,2006,44(10): 2366-2375. doi: 10.2514/1.20661
    [55] JIANG Yuguang,WANG Qi,ZHANG Duo,et al. One-dimensional modelling and analysis of flow excursion of cracking hydrocarbon fuel in scramjet parallel cooling channels[J]. Fuel,2023,340: 127462. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127462
    [56] WARD T A,ERVIN J S,STRIEBICH R C,et al. Simulations of flowing mildly-cracked normal alkanes incorporating proportional product distributions[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power,2004,20(3): 394-402. doi: 10.2514/1.10380
    [57] ZHOU Weixing,JIA Zhenjian,QIN Jiang,et al. Experimental study on effect of pressure on heat sink of n-decane[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal,2014,243: 127-136. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.12.081
    [58] MEADOR W E,SMART M K. Reference enthalpy method developed from solutions of the boundary-layer equations[J]. AIAA Journal,2005,43(1): 135-139. doi: 10.2514/1.2656
  • 加载中
图(26) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  864
  • HTML浏览量:  348
  • PDF量:  68
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-02-27
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-06-03

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回