Improved fatigue design method and experimental verification of low-pressure turbine shaft
-
摘要:
总结了轴高低周复合疲劳设计名义应力法的两种传统方法:大扭矩当量稳态剪应力方法和多轴等效应力方法。由于这两种传统方法存在以下适用局限性:大扭矩当量稳态剪应力方法仅适用于轴弯矩载荷可忽略的部位;多轴等效应力方法仅适用于应力集中系数可忽略的部位疲劳储备评估,不适用于疲劳寿命及累积损伤评估。参考了多份相关资料中的疲劳设计方法,提炼优点,规避缺点,提出了适用范围更广泛、理论原理更合理的轴改进疲劳设计方法,应用于某低压涡轮轴高低周复合疲劳设计,并经试验验证分析。结果表明:该改进方法计算结果与两个阶段试验现象吻合,疲劳损伤偏差为12.6%,明显好于传统方法的84.7%,满足寿命分析结果误差控制在2倍散度以内(即误差范围为−50%~100%)的通常工程要求。
Abstract:Two traditional methods of nominal stress method for shaft high-low cycle combined fatigue design were summarized: large torque equivalent steady-state shear stress method and multi-axis equivalent stress method. These two traditional methods have the following limitations: the large torque equivalent steady-state shear stress method is only suitable for shaft parts with negligible bending moment load; and the multi-axis equivalent stress method is only suitable for fatigue reserve evaluation of parts with negligible stress concentration coefficient, but not for fatigue life and cumulative damage evaluation. Referring to the fatigue design methods in many related books, the advantages were refined while avoiding the disadvantages, an improved fatigue design method of shaft with wider application scope and more reasonable theoretical principle was put forward, which was then applied to the high-low cycle combined fatigue design of a low-pressure turbine shaft, and also the experimental verification. The results showed that the calculation results of this improved method coincided with the phenomena of the two-stage test, and the fatigue damage deviation was 12.6%, which was significantly better than that of the traditional method (84.7%), and met the engineering needs of the life analysis results within 2 times the scattering error control (i.e., error range: −50%—100%) of the usual requirements.
-
表 1 分散系数u、f4和f5的取值建议
Table 1. Suggestions on the values of dispersion coefficients u, f4 and f5
参数 锻件或机械加工件 焊接件或铸件 u 1.1 1.3 f4 1.1 1.3 f5 1.4 1.9 表 2 两个阶段复合疲劳试验载荷谱的具体试验加载载荷
Table 2. Specific test load of two-stage combined fatigue test load spectrum
参数 第1阶段
(载荷谱1)第2阶段
(载荷谱2)低周载荷 轴向力/N 71990 84000 主扭矩/(N·m) 21682 24500 高周载荷 振动扭矩/(N·m) 2760 3000 弯矩/(N·m) 2740 3700 高低周载荷频率比 1112 ∶11112 ∶1表 3 有限元局部应力计算结果
Table 3. Finite element calculation results of local stress
参数 主循环(低周)局部
等效应力最大处次循环(高周)局部
等效应力最大处主次循环(高低周)复合局部
等效应力最大处节点号 43306 45261 45604 离轴外表面距离/mm 1.03 1.04 1.73 主循环(低周)局部
应力分量σr,l/MPa 106 101 176 σθ,l/MPa 472 340 529 σz,l/MPa 544 623 503 τrθ,l/MPa −6 −26 0 τzθ,l/MPa 495 433 501 τzr,l/MPa 4 −26 −6 主循环(低周)局部
等效应力σeq,l/MPa 948 879 932 次循环(高周)局部
应力分量σr,h/MPa 12 18 24 σθ,h/MPa 51 70 96 σz,h/MPa 58 139 96 τrθ,h/MPa −1 3 7 τzθ,h/MPa 53 93 94 τzr,h/MPa 0 6 6 次循环(高周)局部
等效应力σeq,h/MPa 101 193 179 表 4 疲劳强度储备、寿命和累积损伤计算结果
Table 4. Calculation results of fatigue strength reserve, life and cumulative damage
参数 传统方法一 传统方法二 改进方法一 改进方法二 疲劳强度储备最低的节点号 45604 45261 45261 试验载荷谱1 轴疲劳储备系数Kf 1.94 0.98 1.39 1.41 轴考虑分散系数的疲劳储备系数$K'_{\mathrm{f}} $ 1.49 1.06 1.09 轴复合疲劳的低周寿命Ni 76456 14487 18411 轴经历的低周循环数ni 9000 9000 9000 9000 轴的累积损伤Di 0.1177 0.6213 0.4888 试验载荷谱2 轴疲劳储备系数Kf 1.73 0.85 1.20 1.22 轴考虑分散系数的疲劳储备系数$K'_{\mathrm{f}} $ 1.33 0.91 0.93 轴复合疲劳的低周寿命Ni 43076 1875 2391 轴经历的低周循环数ni 1523 1523 1523 1523 轴的累积损伤Di 0.0354 0.8124 0.6369 2个试验载荷谱轴的总累积损伤Dz 0.1531 1.4336 1.1257 总累积损伤Dz的误差(计算相对于试验结果)/% −84.7 43.4 12.6 -
[1] 国际航空编辑部. 斯贝MK202发动机应力标准(EGD-3)[M]. 北京: 国际航空编辑部,1979. International Aviation Editorial Board. Spey MK202 engine stress standard (EGD-3) [M]. Beijing: International Aviation Editorial Office,1979. (in ChineseInternational Aviation Editorial Board. Spey MK202 engine stress standard (EGD-3) [M]. Beijing: International Aviation Editorial Office, 1979. (in Chinese) [2] 《航空发动机设计手册》总编委会. 航空发动机设计手册: 第18册 叶片轮盘及主轴强度分析[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社,2001. General Editorial Board of the Aero Engine Design Manual. Aero-engine design manual: Volume 18 strength analysis of blade disc and spindle [M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press,2001. (in ChineseGeneral Editorial Board of the Aero Engine Design Manual. Aero-engine design manual: Volume 18 strength analysis of blade disc and spindle [M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2001. (in Chinese) [3] 苏清友. 航空涡喷、涡扇发动机主要零部件定寿指南[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社,2004. SU Qingyou. Guide for life determination of main components of aviation turbojet and turbofan engines[M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press,2004. (in ChineseSU Qingyou. Guide for life determination of main components of aviation turbojet and turbofan engines[M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2004. (in Chinese) [4] 赵少汴. 抗疲劳设计手册[M]. 2版. 北京: 机械工业出版社,2015. ZHAO Shaobian. Anti-fatigue design manual[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: China Machine Press,2015. (in ChineseZHAO Shaobian. Anti-fatigue design manual[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2015. (in Chinese) [5] 姚卫星. 结构疲劳寿命分析[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社,2003. YAO Weixing. Fatigue life prediction of structures[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press,2003. (in ChineseYAO Weixing. Fatigue life prediction of structures[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2003. (in Chinese) [6] 徐灏. 疲劳强度设计[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社,1981. XU Hao. Fatigue strength design[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press,1981. (in ChineseXU Hao. Fatigue strength design[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 1981. (in Chinese) [7] 许金泉. 材料强度学[M]. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社,2009. XU Jinquan. Theory on the strength of materials[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press,2009. (in ChineseXU Jinquan. Theory on the strength of materials[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, 2009. (in Chinese) [8] 陆山,陈倩,陈军. 航空发动机主轴疲劳寿命预测方法[J]. 航空动力学报,2010,25(1): 148-151. LU Shan,CHEN Qian,CHEN Jun. Method of predicted fatigue life of aero-engine’s principal shaft[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power,2010,25(1): 148-151. (in ChineseLU Shan, CHEN Qian, CHEN Jun. Method of predicted fatigue life of aero-engine’s principal shaft[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2010, 25(1): 148-151. (in Chinese) [9] 章胜,张勇,李锦红. 基于最差件等寿命曲线的桨轴高低周复合疲劳寿命分析[J]. 航空动力学报,2019,34(4): 847-852. ZHANG Sheng,ZHANG Yong,LI Jinhong. CF/LCF complex fatigue analysis of propeller shaft based on the worst-case equilife curve[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power,2019,34(4): 847-852. (in ChineseZHANG Sheng, ZHANG Yong, LI Jinhong. CF/LCF complex fatigue analysis of propeller shaft based on the worst-case equilife curve[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2019, 34(4): 847-852. (in Chinese) [10] 李睿,鲍蕊,费斌军. 2024-T3铝合金孔板高低周复合疲劳试验研究[J]. 飞机设计,2010,30(3): 18-22. LI Rui,BAO Rui,FEI Binjun. Experimental investigation on combined high and low cycle fatigue performance of 2024-T3 aluminum alloy plate with hole[J]. Aircraft Design,2010,30(3): 18-22. (in Chinese doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4599.2010.03.004LI Rui, BAO Rui, FEI Binjun. Experimental investigation on combined high and low cycle fatigue performance of 2024-T3 aluminum alloy plate with hole[J]. Aircraft Design, 2010, 30(3): 18-22. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4599.2010.03.004 [11] 岳鹏. 发动机涡轮叶片高低周复合疲劳寿命预测与可靠性分析[D]. 成都: 电子科技大学,2017. YUE Peng. Combined cycle fatigue life prediction and reliability analysis of turbine blades[D]. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,2017. (in ChineseYUE Peng. Combined cycle fatigue life prediction and reliability analysis of turbine blades[D]. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2017. (in Chinese) [12] 刘文珽,黄季墀,刘小冬,等. 军用飞机结构疲劳设计细节疲劳额定值方法指南[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社,2012. LIU Wenting,HUANG Jichi,LIU Xiaodong,et al. Military aircraft structural fatigue design detail fatigue rating methodological guide[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press,2012. (in ChineseLIU Wenting, HUANG Jichi, LIU Xiaodong, et al. Military aircraft structural fatigue design detail fatigue rating methodological guide[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2012. (in Chinese) [13] SURESH S. 材料的疲劳[M]. 王中光,译. 2版. 北京: 国防工业出版社,1999. SURESH S. Fatigue of materials [M]. Translated by WANG Zhongguang. 2nd ed. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press,1999. (in ChineseSURESH S. Fatigue of materials [M]. Translated by WANG Zhongguang. 2nd ed. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 1999. (in Chinese) [14] SCHIJVE J. 结构与材料的疲劳[M]. 吴学仁,译. 2版. 北京: 航空工业出版社,2014. SCHIJVE J. Fatigue of structures and materials [M]. Translated by WU Xueren. 2nd ed. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press,2014. (in ChineseSCHIJVE J. Fatigue of structures and materials [M]. Translated by WU Xueren. 2nd ed. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2014. (in Chinese) [15] OSGOOD C C. 疲劳设计[M]. 李寿同,仇仲翼,译. 北京: 科学出版社,1982. OSGOOD C C. Design for fatigue [M]. Translated by LI Shoutong,QIU Zhongyi. Beijing: Science Press,1982. (in ChineseOSGOOD C C. Design for fatigue [M]. Translated by LI Shoutong, QIU Zhongyi. Beijing: Science Press, 1982. (in Chinese) [16] PETERSON R E. 设计中的应力集中系数 [M]. 刘纯朴,译. 北京: 中国工业出版社,1965. PETERSON R E. Stress concentration factors in design[M]. Translated by LIU Chunpu. Beijing: China Industrial Press,1965. (in ChinesePETERSON R E. Stress concentration factors in design[M]. Translated by LIU Chunpu. Beijing: China Industrial Press, 1965. (in Chinese) [17] 《航空发动机设计用材料数据手册》编委会. 航空发动机设计用材料数据手册: 第3册 高温合金[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社,2008. Editorial Board of the Data Book of Materials for Aero Engine Design. Aero-engine design materials data book: Volume 3 high-temperature alloy [M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press,2008. (in ChineseEditorial Board of the Data Book of Materials for Aero Engine Design. Aero-engine design materials data book: Volume 3 high-temperature alloy [M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2008. (in Chinese) [18] 孙万超,廖连芳,陈璐璐,等. 风扇轴高/低周复合疲劳试验方法研究及设计[J]. 航空动力学报,2017,32(6): 1349-1358. SUN Wanchao,LIAO Lianfang,CHEN Lulu,et al. Investigation and design for HCF/LCF complex fatigue experiment method of fan shaft[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power,2017,32(6): 1349-1358. (in ChineseSUN Wanchao, LIAO Lianfang, CHEN Lulu, et al. Investigation and design for HCF/LCF complex fatigue experiment method of fan shaft[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(6): 1349-1358. (in Chinese) [19] 王通北,陈美英. 军用航空发动机主轴疲劳寿命的试验验证[J]. 航空发动机,2000,26(3): 42-49,65. WANG Tongbei,CHEN Meiying. Experimental verification of fatigue life of military aero-engine spindle[J]. Aeroengine,2000,26(3): 42-49,65. (in ChineseWANG Tongbei, CHEN Meiying. Experimental verification of fatigue life of military aero-engine spindle[J]. Aeroengine, 2000, 26(3): 42-49, 65. (in Chinese) -

下载: