留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

RP-3航空煤油模型燃料及其骨架机理构建方法研究

禹进 龚相奎 张俊良

禹进, 龚相奎, 张俊良. RP-3航空煤油模型燃料及其骨架机理构建方法研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(7):20230295 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20230295
引用本文: 禹进, 龚相奎, 张俊良. RP-3航空煤油模型燃料及其骨架机理构建方法研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(7):20230295 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20230295
YU Jin, GONG Xiangkui, ZHANG Junliang. Study on surrogate model fuel and a methodology for developing skeletal mechanism for RP-3 aviation kerosene[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(7):20230295 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20230295
Citation: YU Jin, GONG Xiangkui, ZHANG Junliang. Study on surrogate model fuel and a methodology for developing skeletal mechanism for RP-3 aviation kerosene[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(7):20230295 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20230295

RP-3航空煤油模型燃料及其骨架机理构建方法研究

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20230295
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(52006020); 重庆市教委科研项目重点项目(KJZD-K202300704)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    禹进(1990-),男,副教授,博士,主要从事替代燃料模型研究。E-mail:yjin123@yeah.net

  • 中图分类号: V511+.1;TK401

Study on surrogate model fuel and a methodology for developing skeletal mechanism for RP-3 aviation kerosene

  • 摘要:

    提出了一种同时实现物理替代和化学替代的RP-3航空煤油模型燃料,该模型燃料由正十二烷、2, 5-二甲基己烷、 1, 3, 5-三甲基苯和十氢化萘组成,各组分的摩尔分数分别为0.54、0.22、0.14和0.1。针对现有骨架机理构建方法的局限性,提出了一种骨架机理构建方法,成功开发了包含153种组分和858个反应的高精度模型燃料骨架机理。通过系统验证,该模型燃料在物性参数(密度、黏度、喷雾贯穿距等)和基础燃烧特性(着火延迟时间、组分浓度变化、层流火焰传播特性、NO 排放等)方面均能较准确地预测RP-3燃油的物理化学行为。此外,数值模拟进一步证实该模型燃料可在853、898 K和923 K环境温度下准确预测 RP-3 燃油在定容燃烧室中的喷雾燃烧着火过程,充分验证了其物理和化学替代能力。该研究为高碳燃料模型燃料及机理构建提供了一种思路。

     

  • 图 1  不同方法对比示意图

    Figure 1.  Different methods for contrast diagram

    图 2  模型燃料的主要反应路径

    Figure 2.  Main reaction path of surrogate model fuel

    图 3  简化机理示意图

    Figure 3.  Schematic diagram of simplification mechanism

    图 4  T=500 K,p=1.5 MPa,dj=0.18 mm,pj=40 MPa的条件下,数值模拟和实验测量图像[26]的比较

    Figure 4.  Comparison of numerical simulation and experimental measurement images [26] under the conditions of ambient temperature of500 K, pressure of 1.5 MPa, nozzle outlet diameter of 0.18 mm and injection pressure of 40 MPa

    图 5  本文模型燃料计算值与实验值[25-26]、Ren等[27]和曾文等[5]模型燃料计算值的比较

    Figure 5.  Comparison between the calculated fuel values of the model in this article and experimental values[25-26], as well as the calculated fuel values of Ren et al[27], and Zeng et al[5] models

    图 6  基础燃料的着火延迟时间模拟值与实验数据的比较[29-33]

    Figure 6.  Comparison of simulated ignition delay time of surrogate component with experimental data[29-33]

    图 7  基础燃料的物种浓度分布模拟值与实验数据[30, 34-36]的比较

    Figure 7.  Comparison of simulated species molar fraction distribution of surrogate component with experimental data[30, 34-36]

    图 8  基础燃料的层流火焰速度模拟值与实验数据[31, 37-40]的比较

    Figure 8.  Comparison of simulated laminar flame speeds of surrogate component with experimental data[31, 37-40]

    图 9  RP-3模型燃料骨架机理的着火延迟时间预测值与实验值[6-7, 41]的比较

    Figure 9.  Comparison of predicted and experimental [6-7, 41] ignition delay times for RP-3 surrogate model fuel skeleton mechanism

    图 10  RP-3模型燃料骨架机理在p=2 MPa和φ=1.0条件下的着火延迟时间敏感性分析

    Figure 10.  Sensitivity analysis of ignition delay time of RP-3 surrogate model fuel skeleton mechanism at p=2 MPa and φ=1.0

    图 11  RP-3模型燃料骨架机理在p=0.1 MPa和τ=2.0 s条件下的JSR中组分浓度预测值与实验值[42]对比

    Figure 11.  Comparison of predicted and experimental [42] species concentrations in JSR for RP-3 surrogate model fuel skeleton mechanism at p=0.1 MPa and τ=2.0 s

    图 12  RP-3模型燃料层流火焰速度模拟值与实验值[13, 42]对比(p=0.1 MPa)

    Figure 12.  Comparison of simulated laminar flame speeds of RP-3 surrogate model fuel with experimental data [13, 42]p=0.1 MPa)

    图 13  不同当量比下NO的摩尔浓度与实验值[43]的比较

    Figure 13.  Comparison of the concentration change of NO with experimental values [43] at different equivalent ratios

    图 14  计算网格的Y-Z平面图

    Figure 14.  Y-Z plan of computational grid

    图 15  不同网格长度下计算值与实验值[44]的比较

    Figure 15.  Comparison of calculated and experimental values[44] under different grid lengths

    图 16  RP-3模型燃料在不同环境温度下的缸压曲线与实验数据[44]的比较

    Figure 16.  Comparison of cylinder pressure curves and experimental data[44] of RP-3 surrogate model fuel at different ambient temperatures

  • [1] 范学军,俞刚. 大庆RP-3航空煤油热物性分析[J]. 推进技术,2006,27(2): 187-192. FAN Xuejun,YU Gang. Analysis of thermophysical properties of Daqing RP-3 aviation kerosene[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology,2006,27(2): 187-192. (in Chinese doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4055.2006.02.021

    FAN Xuejun, YU Gang. Analysis of thermophysical properties of Daqing RP-3 aviation kerosene[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2006, 27(2): 187-192. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4055.2006.02.021
    [2] ZHONG Fengquan,FAN Xuejun,YU Gong,et al. Heat transfer of aviation kerosene at supercritical conditions[J]. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer,2009,23(3): 543-550. doi: 10.2514/1.41619
    [3] 裴鑫岩,侯凌云,莫崇康,等. 航空煤油替代燃料模型热物性[J]. 航空动力学报,2015,30(9): 2122-2128. PEI Xinyan,HOU Lingyun,MO Chongkang,et al. Thermo-physical properties for surrogate models of aviation kerosene[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power,2015,30(9): 2122-2128. (in Chinese

    PEI Xinyan, HOU Lingyun, MO Chongkang, et al. Thermo-physical properties for surrogate models of aviation kerosene[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2015, 30(9): 2122-2128. (in Chinese)
    [4] 程泽源,朱剑琴,金钊. 吸热型碳氢燃料RP-3替代模型研究[J]. 航空动力学报,2016,31(2): 391-398. CHENG Zeyuan,ZHU Jianqin,JIN Zhao. Study on surrogate model of endothermic hydrocarbon fuel RP-3[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power,2016,31(2): 391-398. (in Chinese

    CHENG Zeyuan, ZHU Jianqin, JIN Zhao. Study on surrogate model of endothermic hydrocarbon fuel RP-3[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2016, 31(2): 391-398. (in Chinese)
    [5] 曾文,刘靖,张治博,等. 一种新的RP-3航空煤油模拟替代燃料[J]. 航空动力学报,2017,32(10): 2314-2320. ZENG Wen,LIU Jing,ZHANG Zhibo,et al. A new surrogate fuel of RP-3 kerosene[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power,2017,32(10): 2314-2320. (in Chinese

    ZENG Wen, LIU Jing, ZHANG Zhibo, et al. A new surrogate fuel of RP-3 kerosene[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(10): 2314-2320. (in Chinese)
    [6] ZHANG Changhua,LI Bin,RAO Fan,et al. A shock tube study of the autoignition characteristics of RP-3 jet fuel[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute,2015,35(3): 3151-3158. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2014.05.017
    [7] MAO Yebing,YU Liang,WU Zhiyong,et al. Experimental and kinetic modeling study of ignition characteristics of RP-3 kerosene over low-to-high temperature ranges in a heated rapid compression machine and a heated shock tube[J]. Combustion and Flame,2019,203: 157-169. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.02.015
    [8] 郑东,于维铭,钟北京. RP-3航空煤油替代燃料及其化学反应动力学模型[J]. 物理化学学报,2015,31(4): 636-642. ZHENG Dong,YU Weiming,ZHONG Beijing. RP-3 aviation kerosene surrogate fuel and the chemical reaction kinetic model[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica,2015,31(4): 636-642. (in Chinese doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201501231

    ZHENG Dong, YU Weiming, ZHONG Beijing. RP-3 aviation kerosene surrogate fuel and the chemical reaction kinetic model[J]. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2015, 31(4): 636-642. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3866/PKU.WHXB201501231
    [9] 曾文,李海霞,马洪安,等. RP-3航空煤油模拟替代燃料的化学反应简化机理[J]. 推进技术,2014,35(8): 1139-1145. ZENG Wen,LI Haixia,MA Hongan,et al. Reduced chemical reaction mechanism of surrogate fuel for RP-3 kerosene[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology,2014,35(8): 1139-1145. (in Chinese

    ZENG Wen, LI Haixia, MA Hongan, et al. Reduced chemical reaction mechanism of surrogate fuel for RP-3 kerosene[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2014, 35(8): 1139-1145. (in Chinese)
    [10] 陈登炳,刘云鹏,方文,等. 一种RP-3航空煤油的三组分替代燃料简化机理构建与验证[J]. 推进技术,2019,40(3): 691-698. CHEN Dengbing,LIU Yunpeng,FANG Wen,et al. A simplified mechanism model of three component surrogate fuels for RP-3 aviation kerosene and its verification[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology,2019,40(3): 691-698. (in Chinese

    CHEN Dengbing, LIU Yunpeng, FANG Wen, et al. A simplified mechanism model of three component surrogate fuels for RP-3 aviation kerosene and its verification[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2019, 40(3): 691-698. (in Chinese)
    [11] LIU Yunpeng,LIU Yuchen,CHEN Dengbing,et al. A simplified mechanistic model of three-component surrogate fuels for RP-3 aviation kerosene[J]. Energy and Fuels,2018,32(9): 9949-9960. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b02094
    [12] LIU Xing,WANG Ying,BAI Yuanqi,et al. Development and verification of a physical–chemical surrogate model of RP-3 kerosene with skeletal mechanism for aircraft SI engine[J]. Fuel,2022,311: 122626.
    [13] LIU Jing,HU Erjiang,YIN Geyuan,et al. An experimental and kinetic modeling study on the low-temperature oxidation,ignition delay time,and laminar flame speed of a surrogate fuel for RP-3 kerosene[J]. Combustion and Flame,2022,237: 111821. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111821
    [14] CHANG Yachao,JIA Ming,LI Yaopeng,et al. Development of a skeletal mechanism for diesel surrogate fuel by using a decoupling methodology[J]. Combustion and Flame,2015,162(10): 3785-3802. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.07.016
    [15] DOOLEY S,WON S H,CHAOS M,et al. A jet fuel surrogate formulated by real fuel properties[J]. Combustion and Flame,2010,157(12): 2333-2339. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.07.001
    [16] ZHANG Xiaoyuan,SARATHY S M. A lumped kinetic model for high-temperature pyrolysis and combustion of 50 surrogate fuel components and their mixtures[J]. Fuel,2021,286: 119361. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119361
    [17] 禹进,余彬彬,于佳佳. RP-3航空煤油综合替代燃料模型构建[J]. 航空动力学报,2020,35(4): 673-681. YU Jin,YU Binbin,YU Jiajia. Development of comprehensive surrogate fuel model for RP-3 aviation kerosene[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power,2020,35(4): 673-681. (in Chinese

    YU Jin, YU Binbin, YU Jiajia. Development of comprehensive surrogate fuel model for RP-3 aviation kerosene[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2020, 35(4): 673-681. (in Chinese)
    [18] ZHOU Chong-Wen,LI Yang,Burke Ultan,et al. An experimental and chemical kinetic modeling study of 1,3-butadiene combustion: Ignition delay time and laminar flame speed measurements[J]. Combustion and Flame,2018,197: 423-438. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.08.006
    [19] FANG Xiaoyuan,HUANG Xiaoyu,CHEN Wenkai,et al. Development of a skeletal surrogate mechanism for emulating combustion characteristics of diesel from direct coal liquefaction[J]. Combustion and Flame,2020,218: 84-97. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.03.022
    [20] BAO Yulei,DU Hui,CHAI W S,et al. Numerical investigation and optimization on laminar burning velocity of ammonia-based fuels based on GRI3.0 mechanism[J]. Fuel,2022,318: 123681. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123681
    [21] PEPIOT-DESJARDINS P,PITSCH H. An efficient error-propagation-based reduction method for large chemical kinetic mechanisms[J]. Combustion and Flame,2008,154(1/2): 67-81.
    [22] STAGNI A,FRASSOLDATI A,CUOCI A,et al. Skeletal mechanism reduction through species-targeted sensitivity analysis[J]. Combustion and Flame,2016,163: 382-393.
    [23] CURTIS N J,NIEMEYER K E,SUNG C J. An automated target species selection method for dynamic adaptive chemistry simulations[J]. Combustion and Flame,2015,162(4): 1358-1374. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.11.004
    [24] CHEN Yulin,CHEN J Y. Towards improved automatic chemical kinetic model reduction regarding ignition delays and flame speeds[J]. Combustion and Flame,2018,190: 293-301. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.11.024
    [25] LIU Tao,FU Wei,YI Bolun,et al. Experimental investigations of kerosene sprays in pressurized evaporating environments[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers: Part A Journal of Power and Energy,2019,233(3): 413-427.
    [26] LU Yao,PAN Jianfeng,FAN Baowei,et al. Research on the application of aviation kerosene in a direct injection rotary engine: Part 1 fundamental spray characteristics and optimized injection strategies[J]. Energy Conversion and Management,2019,195: 519-532. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.05.042
    [27] REN Yu,ZHU Jian,DENG Hong. Numerical study of heat transfer of RP-3 at supercritical pressure[J]. Advanced Materials Research,2013,663: 470-476.
    [28] KEE Robert J,RUPLEY Fran M,MILLER James A. Chemkin-Ⅱ A Fortran chemical kinetics package for the analysis of gas-phase chemical kinetics[R]. Sandia National Lab. (SNL-CA),Livermore,CA (United States),1989.
    [29] SHEN H S,STEINBERG J,VANDEROVER J,et al. A shock tube study of the ignition of n-heptane,n-decane,n-dodecane,and n-tetradecane at elevated pressures[J]. Energy & Fuels,2009,23(5): 2482-2489.
    [30] SARATHY S M,JAVED T,KARSENTY F,et al. A comprehensive combustion chemistry study of 2,5-dimethylhexane[J]. Combustion and Flame,2014,161(6): 1444-1459. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.12.010
    [31] DIÉVART P,KIM H H,WON S H,et al. The combustion properties of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene and a kinetic model[J]. Fuel,2013,109: 125-136. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.11.069
    [32] OEHLSCHLAEGER M A,SHEN H S,FRASSOLDATI A,et al. Experimental and kinetic modeling study of the pyrolysis and oxidation of decalin[J]. Energy and Fuels,2009,23(3): 1464-1472. doi: 10.1021/ef800892y
    [33] ZHU Y,DAVIDSON D F,HANSON R K. Pyrolysis and oxidation of decalin at elevated pressures: a shock-tube study[J]. Combustion and Flame,2014,161(2): 371-383. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.09.005
    [34] MZÉ-AHMED A,HADJ-ALI K,DAGAUT P,et al. Experimental and modeling study of the oxidation kinetics of n-undecane and n-dodecane in a jet-stirred reactor[J]. Energy and Fuels,2012,26(7): 4253-4268. doi: 10.1021/ef300588j
    [35] GUDIYELLA S,BREZINSKY K. High pressure study of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene oxidation[J]. Combustion and Flame,2012,159(11): 3264-3285. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.06.014
    [36] DAGAUT P,RISTORI A,FRASSOLDATI A,et al. Experimental and semi-detailed kinetic modeling study of decalin oxidation and pyrolysis over a wide range of conditions[J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute,2013,34(1): 289-296. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2012.05.099
    [37] JI Chunsheng,DAMES E,WANG Y L,et al. Propagation and extinction of premixed C5–C12 n-alkane flames[J]. Combustion and Flame,2010,157(2): 277-287. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.06.011
    [38] JI Chunsheng,SARATHY S M,VELOO P S,et al. Effects of fuel branching on the propagation of octane isomers flames[J]. Combustion and Flame,2012,159(4): 1426-1436. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.12.004
    [39] COMANDINI A,DUBOIS T,ABID S,et al. Comparative study on cyclohexane and decalin oxidation[J]. Energy & Fuels,2014,28(1): 714-724.
    [40] LI Bo,ZHANG Hai,EGOLFOPOULOS F N. Laminar flame propagation of atmospheric iso-cetane/air and decalin/air mixtures[J]. Combustion and Flame,2014,161(1): 154-161. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.07.014
    [41] YANG Zhiyuan,ZENG Ping,WANG Biyao,et al. Ignition characteristics of an alternative kerosene from direct coal liquefaction and its blends with conventional RP-3 jet fuel[J]. Fuel,2021,291: 120258. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120258
    [42] LIU Yu,WANG Jinduo,GU Wu,et al. An experiment study on the laminar burning velocity and markstein length of chlorella oil/RP-3 kerosene blends[J]. ACS Omega,2020,5(37): 23510-23519. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00789
    [43] XUE Xin,LIN Yuzhen,ZHANG Chi,et al. Experimental Study on NOx and CO Emissions of Aviation Kerosene and Coal-to-Liquid Synthetic Aviation Fuel in a Jet Stirred Combustion Reactor[C]// Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. Düsseldorf,Germany: ASME,2014: 26003.
    [44] DUAN Yaozong,LIU Wang,HUANG Zhen,et al. An experimental study on spray auto-ignition of RP-3 jet fuel and its surrogates[J]. Frontiers in Energy,2021,15(2): 396-404. doi: 10.1007/s11708-020-0715-y
    [45] RICHARDS K,SENECAL P K,POMRANING E. Converge (version 2.2.0) manual[Z]. Convergent Science Inc.,Madison,WI,2014.
    [46] SENECAL J P,JI Wei. Approaches for mitigating over-solving in multiphysics simulations[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering,2017,112(6): 503-528. doi: 10.1002/nme.5516
  • 加载中
图(16)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  640
  • HTML浏览量:  396
  • PDF量:  71
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-05-06
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-04-03

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回