留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于代理模型法的航空燃油泵空化性能优化

王晓晖 张凯 苗森春 李柯剑 申正精

王晓晖, 张凯, 苗森春, 等. 基于代理模型法的航空燃油泵空化性能优化[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(8):20230406 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20230406
引用本文: 王晓晖, 张凯, 苗森春, 等. 基于代理模型法的航空燃油泵空化性能优化[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(8):20230406 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20230406
WANG Xiaohui, ZHANG Kai, MIAO Senchun, et al. Optimization of aviation fuel pump cavitation performance based on surrogate model[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(8):20230406 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20230406
Citation: WANG Xiaohui, ZHANG Kai, MIAO Senchun, et al. Optimization of aviation fuel pump cavitation performance based on surrogate model[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(8):20230406 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20230406

基于代理模型法的航空燃油泵空化性能优化

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20230406
基金项目: 中国博士后科学基金(2022M712676); 甘肃省杰出青年基金(20JR10RA203); 河南省博士后科研启动项目(2021-181)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    王晓晖(1986-),男,副教授、硕士生导师,博士,主要从事航空燃油泵内流机理及工程应用研究

    通讯作者:

    苗森春(1988-),男,副教授、硕士生导师,博士,主要从事流体机械性能优化理论研究。E-mail:miaosc88@126.com

  • 中图分类号: V233.2+2

Optimization of aviation fuel pump cavitation performance based on surrogate model

  • 摘要:

    为提高航空燃油泵空化性能,以某型离心式航空燃油泵为例,对叶轮流道几何参数进行参数化优化设计,生成以流道几何参数为输入、以增压值和空化体积为输出的响应样本空间。基于最优预测元模型,拟合最优代理模型,并进行全局敏感性分析,发现叶轮进口边参数与中间型线参数对燃油泵增压值与空化体积影响较大。通过遗传算法获得最优流道几何参数,采用数值模拟方法,对获得的最优参数进行验证,结果表明:优化后燃油泵的压力系数提高0.035,空化性能提高22.28%。叶轮空化面积与空泡体积显著下降,不同叶片间压力载荷分布得到改善,叶轮内部压力脉动幅值有所下降。

     

  • 图 1  全流道计算域与单流道计算域

    Figure 1.  Full-flow computational domain and single-flow computational domain

    图 2  网格无关性验证

    Figure 2.  Mesh independence verification

    图 3  网格划分

    Figure 3.  Result of mesh generation

    图 4  叶片近壁面y+分布

    Figure 4.  Blade y+ distribution

    图 5  燃油泵试验台示意图

    Figure 5.  Fuel pump test schematic

    图 6  燃油泵外特性曲线

    Figure 6.  Fuel pump external performance curve

    图 7  燃油泵空化特性曲线

    Figure 7.  Fuel pump cavitation performance curve

    图 8  叶片进口边与型线控制

    Figure 8.  Inlet side and impeller profile control

    图 9  全局敏感性分析框架

    Figure 9.  Global sensitivity analysis framework

    图 10  预测系数矩阵

    Figure 10.  Coefficient of prognosis matrix

    图 11  高度敏感的输入变量与输出变量之间的响应关系

    Figure 11.  Response relationship between highly sensitive input variables and output variables

    图 12  优化算法收敛性

    Figure 12.  Optimization convergence

    图 13  优化验证

    Figure 13.  Optimization verification

    图 14  叶片三维模型对比

    Figure 14.  Three-dimensional comparison of blade

    图 15  优化前后外特性曲线

    Figure 15.  External performance curves of numerical simulation before and after optimization

    图 16  优化前后不同空化数下的空泡分布

    Figure 16.  Cavitation bubble distribution under different cavitation numbers before and after optimization

    图 17  叶片压力载荷分布

    Figure 17.  Pressure load distribution of blade

    图 18  监测点位置

    Figure 18.  Location of monitoring points

    图 19  优化前后压力脉动频域图

    Figure 19.  Frequency domain diagram of pressure pulsation before and after optimization

    表  1  不同响应面模型决定系数与预测系数

    Table  1.   Determination coefficients and prognosis coefficients of different response surface models

    输出变量 响应模型 Cd Cpre
    $ {C}_{V} $ 2阶移动最小二乘法模型(指数权重) 0.973 0.969
    $ {C}_{V} $ Kriging 模型(各向同性) 0.976 0.958
    $ {C}_{V} $ 1阶多项式回归模型(无混合项) 0.960 0.956
    $ {C}_{V} $ 1阶移动最小二乘法模型(指数权重) 0.961 0.956
    $ {C}_{V} $ 1阶多项式回归模型(有混合项) 0.956 0.936
    Δp 1阶多项式回归模型(无混合项) 0.900 0.865
    Δp 2阶多项式回归模型(无混合项) 0.877 0.840
    Δp Kriging 模型(各向同性) 0.921 0.832
    Δp 1阶移动最小二乘法模型(指数权重) 0.841 0.830
    Δp 2阶移动最小二乘法模型(指数权重) 0.863 0.819
    Δp 1阶多项式回归模型(有混合项) 0.843 0.797
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 《航空发动机设计手册》编写组. 航空发动机设计手册: 第15分册[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 2000.
    [2] 王维军, 谭向军, 黄巧平. 抗空化航空双端供油泵设计与数值预测[J]. 流体机械, 2021, 49(5): 26-32. WANG Weijun, TAN Xiangjun, HUANG Qiaoping. Design and numerical prediction of anti-cavitation aviation double-inlet fuel pump[J]. Fluid Machinery, 2021, 49(5): 26-32. (in Chinese doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0329.2021.05.005

    WANG Weijun, TAN Xiangjun, HUANG Qiaoping. Design and numerical prediction of anti-cavitation aviation double-inlet fuel pump[J]. Fluid Machinery, 2021, 49(5): 26-32. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0329.2021.05.005
    [3] 张绍基. 航空发动机控制系统的研发与展望[J]. 航空动力学报, 2004, 19(3): 375-382. ZHANG Shaoji. A review of aeroengine control system[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2004, 19(3): 375-382. (in Chinese doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8055.2004.03.018

    ZHANG Shaoji. A review of aeroengine control system[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2004, 19(3): 375-382. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8055.2004.03.018
    [4] 熊英华. 航空燃油泵空化性能分析及优化[D]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2016. XIONG Yinghua. Analysis and optimization of cavitation performance of aviation fuel pump[D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2016. (in Chinese

    XIONG Yinghua. Analysis and optimization of cavitation performance of aviation fuel pump[D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2016. (in Chinese)
    [5] 王维军. 离心式航空燃油泵研究现状与展望[J]. 流体机械, 2020, 48(10): 59-63. WANG Weijun. Research status and prospect of centrifugal aviation fuel pump[J]. Fluid Machinery, 2020, 48(10): 59-63. (in Chinese doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0329.2020.10.011

    WANG Weijun. Research status and prospect of centrifugal aviation fuel pump[J]. Fluid Machinery, 2020, 48(10): 59-63. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0329.2020.10.011
    [6] 薛梅新, 吴迪, 朴英. 加力燃油泵压出室非设计工况内流特征数值模拟[J]. 航空动力学报, 2012, 27(2): 419-424. XUE Meixin, WU Di, PIAO Ying. Numerical simulation on internal flow characteristics in the discharge chamber of an afterburning fuel pump under off-design conditions[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2012, 27(2): 419-424. (in Chinese

    XUE Meixin, WU Di, PIAO Ying. Numerical simulation on internal flow characteristics in the discharge chamber of an afterburning fuel pump under off-design conditions[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2012, 27(2): 419-424. (in Chinese)
    [7] 李嘉, 李华聪, 符江锋, 等. 一体式航空燃油离心泵内流场数值模拟[J]. 西北工业大学学报, 2015, 33(2): 278-283. LI Jia, LI Huacong, FU Jiangfeng, et al. Numerical simulation for the inner flow field of aero fuel centrifugal pump[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2015, 33(2): 278-283. (in Chinese doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2758.2015.02.018

    LI Jia, LI Huacong, FU Jiangfeng, et al. Numerical simulation for the inner flow field of aero fuel centrifugal pump[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2015, 33(2): 278-283. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2758.2015.02.018
    [8] 李嘉, 李华聪, 王淑红, 等. 诱导轮与叶轮组合式航空燃油离心泵轴向力间隙补偿[J]. 航空动力学报, 2016, 31(11): 2765-2772. LI Jia, LI Huacong, WANG Shuhong, et al. Outlet clearance optimization on axial-force of inducer and impeller combination aero fuel centrifugal pump[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2016, 31(11): 2765-2772. (in Chinese

    LI Jia, LI Huacong, WANG Shuhong, et al. Outlet clearance optimization on axial-force of inducer and impeller combination aero fuel centrifugal pump[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2016, 31(11): 2765-2772. (in Chinese)
    [9] 熊英华, 刘影, 赵兴安, 等. 基于代理模型的航空燃油泵空化性能分析[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(10): 2952-2960. XIONG Yinghua, LIU Ying, ZHAO Xing’an, et al. Analysis of cavitation performance of an aviation fuel pump based on surrogate model[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(10): 2952-2960. (in Chinese

    XIONG Yinghua, LIU Ying, ZHAO Xing’an, et al. Analysis of cavitation performance of an aviation fuel pump based on surrogate model[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(10): 2952-2960. (in Chinese)
    [10] 王凯, 龚永祥, 罗光钊, 等. 高速燃油离心泵空化特性分析[J]. 推进技术, 2022, 43(10): 210521. WANG Kai, GONG Yongxiang, LUO Guangzhao, et al. Cavitation characteristics of high-speed fuel centrifugal pump[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2022, 43(10): 210521. (in Chinese

    WANG Kai, GONG Yongxiang, LUO Guangzhao, et al. Cavitation characteristics of high-speed fuel centrifugal pump[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2022, 43(10): 210521. (in Chinese)
    [11] LI Xiaoyu, JI Yunguang, LIU Xiaolan, et al. Numerical study on cavitation characteristics of high speed fuel centrifugal pump[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 688(2): 022002. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/688/2/022002
    [12] XU Zixuan, LI Zhenggui, WANG Weijun, et al. Influence of gas content on performance effect on shunt vane type aviation fuel pump[J]. International Journal of Fluid Machinery and Systems, 2022, 15(1): 121-129. doi: 10.5293/IJFMS.2022.15.1.121
    [13] FRESE F, EINZINGER J, WILL J. Design optimisation of an impeller with CFD and meta-model of optimal prognosis (MoP)[C]//10th International Conference on Turbochargers and Turbocharging. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2012: 121-134.
    [14] BASHIRI M, DERAKHSHAN S, SHAHRABI J. Design optimization of a centrifugal pump using particle swarm optimization algorithm[J]. International Journal of Fluid Machinery and Systems, 2019, 12(4): 322-331. doi: 10.5293/IJFMS.2019.12.4.322
    [15] 姜丙孝, 杨军虎, 王晓晖, 等. 基于高维机器学习方法的离心泵扭曲叶片优化[J]. 航空动力学报, 2022, 37(3): 629-638. JIANG Bingxiao, YANG Junhu, WANG Xiaohui, et al. Optimization of twisted blade of centrifugal pump based on high dimensional machine learning method[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2022, 37(3): 629-638. (in Chinese

    JIANG Bingxiao, YANG Junhu, WANG Xiaohui, et al. Optimization of twisted blade of centrifugal pump based on high dimensional machine learning method[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2022, 37(3): 629-638. (in Chinese)
    [16] 赵才甫, 吴宏飞, 赵海涛, 等. 基于Kriging模型与NLPQL算法的高比转数离心泵参数化设计[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2022, 40(7): 660-666. ZHAO Caifu, WU Hongfei, ZHAO Haitao, et al. Parametric design of high-specific-speed centrifugal pump based on Kriging model and NLPQL algorithm[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2022, 40(7): 660-666. (in Chinese

    ZHAO Caifu, WU Hongfei, ZHAO Haitao, et al. Parametric design of high-specific-speed centrifugal pump based on Kriging model and NLPQL algorithm[J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2022, 40(7): 660-666. (in Chinese)
    [17] 李嘉, 韩小宝, 李华聪, 等. 基于改进Bezier曲线的复合叶轮式离心泵参数化设计及性能仿真[J]. 推进技术, 2022, 43(7): 201009. LI Jia, HAN Xiaobao, LI Huacong, et al. Parametric design and simulation for an aero-fuel centrifugal pump with compound impeller based on improved bezier-curve[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2022, 43(7): 201009. (in Chinese

    LI Jia, HAN Xiaobao, LI Huacong, et al. Parametric design and simulation for an aero-fuel centrifugal pump with compound impeller based on improved bezier-curve[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2022, 43(7): 201009. (in Chinese)
    [18] SOBOL I M. Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models[J]. Matem Modelirovanie, 1990, 2(1): 112-118.
    [19] HOMMA T, SALTELLI A. Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1996, 52(1): 1-17.
    [20] 李斌, 李嘉, 李萍, 等. 基于Kriging的燃油离心泵智能优化设计方法研究[J]. 推进技术, 2023, 44(9): 2207027. LI Bin, LI Jia, LI Ping, et al. Intelligent optimization design me-thod of an aero-fuel centrifugal pump based on Kriging-model[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2023, 44(9): 2207027. (in Chinese

    LI Bin, LI Jia, LI Ping, et al. Intelligent optimization design me-thod of an aero-fuel centrifugal pump based on Kriging-model[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2023, 44(9): 2207027. (in Chinese)
    [21] ROOS D, MOST T, UNGER J F, et al. Advanced surrogate models within the robustness evaluation[J]. Proc. Weimarer Optimierungs-und Stochastiktage, 2007, 4: 29-30.
    [22] XIAO Juan, LIN Weixiang, WANG Simin, et al. Global sensitivity analysis and optimization for coal-water slurry preheaters based on metamodel of optimal prognosis[J]. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications, 2022, 82(9): 507-528. doi: 10.1080/10407782.2022.2079336
  • 加载中
图(19) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  557
  • HTML浏览量:  362
  • PDF量:  42
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-06-21
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-04-14

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回