Application of endwall-suction surface integrated contouring in a compressor stage
-
摘要:
为了解决高负荷轴流压气机端壁角区分离问题,将一种多局部控制通道二次流、适用于多工况的吸力面及端壁联合造型方法应用于2.5级压气机末级静子中,探究造型方法在面对流动情况复杂的压气机环境时,所带来的效率提升或损失控制的效果。通过对最高效率点进行单目标优化,使压气机的末级峰值效率提高了约0.3%。流场分析显示,在多级压气机环境中应用端壁-吸力面一体化造型设计时,造型虽位于静子,但转子通流乃至效率亦受到一定程度的级间干涉。由于原型压气机端区流动结构不同,最优造型流动控制机理与在前期叶栅研究中所得结论有所差异。如此,可在一定程度上证明本文所采用的端壁-吸力面一体化造型方法于多种流动结构控制的可行性,其在压气机环境中的应用效果得到验证。
-
关键词:
- 角区分离 /
- 压气机 /
- 端壁-吸力面一体化造型 /
- 流动控制 /
- 优化设计
Abstract:In order to solve the problem of end-wall corner separation in high-load axial compressors, a combined contouring method of suction surface and end-wall with multiple local control channels for secondary flow applicable to multiple working conditions was applied to the final stage static sub of a 2.5-stage compressor, and the effects of the contouring method in terms of efficiency enhancement or loss control in the face of complex flow conditions of the pressurized gas environment were explored. A single-objective optimization of the highest efficiency point resulted in an improvement of about 0.3% in the final stage peak efficiency of the compressor. The flow field analysis showed that when the integrated end wall-suction surface contouring design was applied in a multi-stage compressor environment, the contouring was located in the static sub, but the rotor flux and even the efficiency were also subjected to a certain degree of interstage interference. Due to different flow structures in the end zone of the prototype compressor, the optimal modeling flow control mechanism differed from the conclusions obtained in the previous vane grid study. In this way, the feasibility of the integrated end-wall-suction surface contouring method adopted to the control of various flow structures can be proved to a certain extent, and its application in the compressor environment has been verified.
-
表 1 压气机级设计参数
Table 1. Design parameters of compressor cascade
设计参数 数值 转子展弦比 0.8 转子叶尖稠度 2.06 转子轮毂比 0.74 转子叶尖速度 0.96Ma 静子折转角/(°) 67 静子轮毂比 2.21 表 2 各部分效率值
Table 2. Efficiency value of each part
参数 数值/% Δη 0.334 Δηr 0.0236 Δηs 0.3645 Δητ − 0.0540 -
[1] 吴艳辉, 王博, 付裕, 等. 轴流压气机角区分离的研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(9): 520974. WU Yanhui, WANG Bo, FU Yu, et al. Research progress of corner separation in axial-flow compressor[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(9): 520974. (in ChineseWU Yanhui, WANG Bo, FU Yu, et al. Research progress of corner separation in axial-flow compressor[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(9): 520974. (in Chinese) [2] 郭爽, 陈绍文, 陆华伟, 等. 组合抽吸对大转角扩压叶栅性能的影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2010, 25(12): 2697-2703. GUO Shuang, CHEN Shaowen, LU Huawei, et al. Effect of compound boundary 1ayer suction on the performance of a high-load diffusion compressor cascade with a 1arge camber angle[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2010, 25(12): 2697-2703. (in ChineseGUO Shuang, CHEN Shaowen, LU Huawei, et al. Effect of compound boundary 1ayer suction on the performance of a high-load diffusion compressor cascade with a 1arge camber angle[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2010, 25(12): 2697-2703. (in Chinese) [3] 梁田, 刘波, 茅晓晨. 附面层抽吸对叶栅角区分离流动的控制研究[J]. 推进技术, 2019, 40(9): 1972-1981. LIANG Tian, LIU Bo, MAO Xiaochen. Investigation of corner separation control for cascade with boundary layer suction[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2019, 40(9): 1972-1981. (in ChineseLIANG Tian, LIU Bo, MAO Xiaochen. Investigation of corner separation control for cascade with boundary layer suction[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2019, 40(9): 1972-1981. (in Chinese) [4] 茅晓晨, 刘波, 曹志远, 等. 端壁射流对压气机叶栅角区分离控制的研究[J]. 推进技术, 2014, 35(12): 1615-1622. MAO Xiaochen, LIU Bo, CAO Zhiyuan, et al. Research on corner separation control for compressor cascade with end-wall jet flow[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2014, 35(12): 1615-1622. (in ChineseMAO Xiaochen, LIU Bo, CAO Zhiyuan, et al. Research on corner separation control for compressor cascade with end-wall jet flow[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2014, 35(12): 1615-1622. (in Chinese) [5] 秦勇, 宋彦萍, 陈浮, 等. 合成射流控制高速扩压叶栅二次流的数值模拟[J]. 航空动力学报, 2018, 33(4): 792-802. QIN Yong, SONG Yanping, CHEN Fu, et al. Numerical simulation of secondary flow control on high-speed compressor cascade with synthetic jets[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2018, 33(4): 792-802. (in ChineseQIN Yong, SONG Yanping, CHEN Fu, et al. Numerical simulation of secondary flow control on high-speed compressor cascade with synthetic jets[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2018, 33(4): 792-802. (in Chinese) [6] 冯秀莲, 金东海, 桂幸民. 叶片弯掠对压气机静子叶片气动性能影响的三维数值模拟[J]. 航空动力学报, 2009, 24(10): 2338-2343. FENG Xiulian, JIN Donghai, GUI Xingmin. Numerical simulation of the aerodynamics performance of swept and curved blade on the compressor stator[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2009, 24(10): 2338-2343. (in ChineseFENG Xiulian, JIN Donghai, GUI Xingmin. Numerical simulation of the aerodynamics performance of swept and curved blade on the compressor stator[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2009, 24(10): 2338-2343. (in Chinese) [7] 吴培根, 王如根, 郭飞飞, 等. 涡流发生器对高负荷扩压叶栅性能影响的机理分析[J]. 推进技术, 2016, 37(1): 49-56. WU Peigen, WANG Rugen, GUO Feifei, et al. Mechanism analysis of effects of vortex generator on high-load compressor cascade[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2016, 37(1): 49-56. (in ChineseWU Peigen, WANG Rugen, GUO Feifei, et al. Mechanism analysis of effects of vortex generator on high-load compressor cascade[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2016, 37(1): 49-56. (in Chinese) [8] 李相君, 董杰忠, 崔义强, 等. 扩压叶栅角区-吸力面造型设计及流动控制机理[J]. 航空动力学报, 2020, 35(12): 2642-2653. LI Xiangjun, DONG Jiezhong, CUI Yiqiang, et al. Flow control mechanism of diffuser cascade corner-suction surface profiling design[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2020, 35(12): 2642-2653. (in ChineseLI Xiangjun, DONG Jiezhong, CUI Yiqiang, et al. Flow control mechanism of diffuser cascade corner-suction surface profiling design[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2020, 35(12): 2642-2653. (in Chinese) [9] HARVEY N W. Some effects of non-axisymmetric end wall profiling on axial flow compressor aerodynamics: Part Ⅰ linear cascade investigation[R]. Berlin, Germany: ASME Turbo Expo 2008: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, 2008. [10] 胡书珍, 卢新根, 张宏武, 等. 亚音速轴流压气机转子非轴对称轮毂端壁的数值研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2009, 30(3): 385-388. HU Shuzhen, LU Xingen, ZHANG Hongwu, et al. Numerical investigation on a subsonic axial-flow compressor rotor with the implementation of non-axiasymmetric hub end wall[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2009, 30(3): 385-388. (in ChineseHU Shuzhen, LU Xingen, ZHANG Hongwu, et al. Numerical investigation on a subsonic axial-flow compressor rotor with the implementation of non-axiasymmetric hub end wall[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2009, 30(3): 385-388. (in Chinese) [11] 唐海兵, 余又红, 李钰洁. 基于轮毂静压的非轴对称端壁造型[J]. 推进技术, 2018, 39(11): 2608-2614. TANG Haibing, YU Youhong, LI Yujie. Non-axisymmetric endwall profiling based on hub static pressure[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2018, 39(11): 2608-2614. (in ChineseTANG Haibing, YU Youhong, LI Yujie. Non-axisymmetric endwall profiling based on hub static pressure[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2018, 39(11): 2608-2614. (in Chinese) [12] 刘波, 曹志远, 黄建, 等. 跨声速轴流压气机非轴对称端壁造型优化设计[J]. 推进技术, 2012, 33(5): 689-694. LIU Bo, CAO Zhiyuan, HUANG Jian, et al. Design optimization for a transonic compressor with implementation of non-axisymmetric endwall contouring[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2012, 33(5): 689-694. (in ChineseLIU Bo, CAO Zhiyuan, HUANG Jian, et al. Design optimization for a transonic compressor with implementation of non-axisymmetric endwall contouring[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2012, 33(5): 689-694. (in Chinese) [13] 陈得胜, 刘波, 那振喆, 等. 针对轴流压气机的非轴对称端壁造型优化设计[J]. 燃气涡轮试验与研究, 2013, 26(1): 16-21, 52. CHEN Desheng, LIU Bo, NA Zhenzhe, et al. Optimized non-axisymmetric endwall contouring for axial compressor[J]. Gas Turbine Experiment and Research, 2013, 26(1): 16-21, 52. (in Chinese doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2620.2013.01.007CHEN Desheng, LIU Bo, NA Zhenzhe, et al. Optimized non-axisymmetric endwall contouring for axial compressor[J]. Gas Turbine Experiment and Research, 2013, 26(1): 16-21, 52. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2620.2013.01.007 [14] 赵伟光, 金东海, 桂幸民. 压气机叶栅非轴对称端壁造型的优化设计[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2013, 34(6): 1047-1050. ZHAO Weiguang, JIN Donghai, GUI Xingmin. Design optimization of non-axisymmetric endwall contouring in compressor cascade[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2013, 34(6): 1047-1050. (in ChineseZHAO Weiguang, JIN Donghai, GUI Xingmin. Design optimization of non-axisymmetric endwall contouring in compressor cascade[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2013, 34(6): 1047-1050. (in Chinese) [15] 刘宝. 轴流压气机叶片与端区一体化优化设计[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2014. LIU Bao. Integrated optimization design of axial compressor blade and end region[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2014. (in ChineseLIU Bao. Integrated optimization design of axial compressor blade and end region[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2014. (in Chinese) [16] REUTTER O, HEMMERT-POTTMANN S, HERGT A, et al. Endwall contouring and fillet design for reducing losses and homogenizing the outflow of a compressor cascade[R]. Dusseldorf, Germany: ASME Turbo Expo 2014: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, 2014. [17] LI Xiangjun, DONG Jiezhong, CHEN Hua, et al. The control of corner separation with parametric suction side corner profiling on a high-load compressor cascade[J]. Aerospace, 2022, 9(3): 172. doi: 10.3390/aerospace9030172 [18] 尤付浩, 李相君, 鲁庆, 等. 基于二次流控制规律的非轴对称端壁造型优化设计[J]. 航空动力学报, 2024, 39(2): 20220215. YOU Fuhao, LI Xiangjun, LU Qing, et al. Optimal design of non-axisymmetric end wall shape based on secondary flow control law[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2024, 39(2): 20220215. (in ChineseYOU Fuhao, LI Xiangjun, LU Qing, et al. Optimal design of non-axisymmetric end wall shape based on secondary flow control law[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2024, 39(2): 20220215. (in Chinese) -

下载: