Kinematics and dynamics simulation analysis of collaborative shaft swashplate engine
-
摘要:
针对传统摆盘发动机约束结构存在振动和噪声问题,提出一种协同轴约束结构设计方案。通过活塞行程方程确定摆盘发动机主要参数,在SolidWorks软件中建立协同轴摆盘发动机的三维模型。为了对比直导槽约束结构在输出端动力学特性,在Adams软件中进行刚体仿真。为了研究协同轴真实约束情况,进行Ansys-Adams联合的刚柔耦合仿真。结果表明:在转速为
1200 r/min的额定工况条件下,协同轴摆盘发动机相较于直导槽摆盘发动机,其输出端的转速偏离峰值降低4.16 r/min,正向和负向角加速度峰值分别减少4375.11 rad/s2和3032.46 rad/s2,前者可作为后者的替代方案;将协同轴柔性化后,虽然协同轴的弹性形变会在仿真开始的0~0.0354 s内造成振动等不利因素,但协同轴依旧起到了约束良好的效果。Abstract:To address the vibration and noise issues in traditional swashplate engines, a collaborative shaft constraint drive structure design scheme was proposed. The major parameters of the swashplate engine were determined through the piston stroke equation, and a 3D model of the collaborative shaft swashplate engine was built in SolidWorks software. To compare the dynamic characteristics at the output end with the straight guide groove structure, rigid body simulation was conducted by Adams software. To investigate the real constraint situation of the collaborative shaft, a combined rigid-flexible coupling simulation was performed using Ansys-Adams. The results indicated that under the rated operating conditions with a speed of 1 200 r/min, the collaborative shaft swashplate engine exhibited a decrease by 4.16 r/min in the deviation of the output speed from the peak compared with the direct groove swinging plate engine. The peak values of positive and negative angular accelerations were also reduced by 4 375.11 rad/s2 and 3 032.46 rad/s2, respectively. The former can be considered as a substitute for the latter. After flexible modification of the coupling shaft, although the flexible deformation of the collaborative shaft caused vibrations and other unfavorable factors within the first 0 s to 0.035 4 s of the simulation, the collaborative shaft still effectively constrained the system.
-
Key words:
- swashplate engine /
- coaxial axes /
- kinematics /
- multibody dynamics /
- rigid-flexible coupling
-
表 1 摆盘发动机主要设计参数
Table 1. Main design parameters of swashplate engine
主要参数 设计值 设计倾斜角α/(°) 17 摆盘作用半径r/mm 110 活塞直径d/mm 74.5 活塞行程h/mm 64.2 连杆有效长度l/mm 180 压缩比 10 表 2 结构Ⅰ各个部件约束关系
Table 2. Constraints of various components of Structure Ⅰ
零件1 零件2 约束 上轴承 大地 固定 输出轴 上轴承 平面副/圆柱副 摆盘 输出轴 平面副 摆盘 中心轴 平面副/圆柱副 中心轴 缸体 平面副/圆柱副 连杆 摆盘(活塞) 球副 活塞 缸体 圆柱副 协同轴 摆盘(下支座) 圆柱副 底座 大地 固定 中心轴 大地 圆柱副 表 3 刚体仿真角速度结果对比
Table 3. Comparison of angular velocity results from rigid body simulations
结果/(r/min) 模型 结构Ⅰ 结构Ⅱ 平均角速度 1199.98 1199.98 转速偏差 0.02 0.02 转速峰值 1197.99 1193.84 偏离峰值 2.01 6.17 偏离平均值 1.24 1.30 表 4 刚体仿真角加速度结果对比
Table 4. Comparison of angular acceleration results from rigid body simulations
结果/(rad/s2) 模型 结构Ⅰ 结构Ⅱ 正向最大值 596.42 4971.53 负向最大值 −657.34 − 3689.80 最大正负差值 1253.76 8661.33 绝对值平均值 70.90 127.03 -
[1] GREWE V, RAO A G, GRÖNSTEDT T, et al. Evaluating the climate impact of aviation emission scenarios towards the Paris agreement including COVID-19 effects[J]. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 3841. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24091-y [2] BENZAQUEN J, HE Jiangbiao, MIRAFZAL B. Toward more electric powertrains in aircraft: technical challenges and advancements[J]. CES Transactions on Electrical Machines and Systems, 2021, 5(3): 177-193. doi: 10.30941/CESTEMS.2021.00022 [3] VISWANATHAN V, KNAPP B M. Potential for electric aircraft[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2019, 2: 88-89. doi: 10.1038/s41893-019-0233-2 [4] BRELJE B J, MARTINS J R R A. Electric, hybrid, and turboelectric fixed-wing aircraft: a review of concepts, models, and design approaches[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2019, 104: 1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.06.004 [5] 马世杰. 鱼雷热动力装置设计原理[M]. 北京: 兵器工业出版社, 1992. MA Shijie. Design principle of torpedo thermal power plant[M]. Beijing: The Publishing House of Ordnance Industry, 1992. (in ChineseMA Shijie. Design principle of torpedo thermal power plant[M]. Beijing: The Publishing House of Ordnance Industry, 1992. (in Chinese) [6] MENG Hao, JI Changwei, WANG Shuofeng, et al. A review: Centurial progress and development of Wankel rotary engine[J]. Fuel, 2023, 335: 127043. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.127043 [7] 汤廷孝, 赵后良, 陈怀海. 海拔高度对转子发动机性能影响的模拟试验[J]. 航空动力学报, 2010, 25(4): 951-956. TANG Tingxiao, ZHAO Houliang, CHEN Huaihai. Simulation experiment of the influence of elevation on performance of a rotary engine[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2010, 25(4): 951-956. (in ChineseTANG Tingxiao, ZHAO Houliang, CHEN Huaihai. Simulation experiment of the influence of elevation on performance of a rotary engine[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2010, 25(4): 951-956. (in Chinese) [8] SEBASTIAMPILLAI J, MARTIN ROLT A, JACOB F, et al. Thermodynamic analysis of nutating disc engine topping cycles for aero-engine applications[J]. Energy, 2019, 182: 641-655. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.180 [9] 李冬梅, 王树宗, 王德石. 摆盘发动机约束机构的动力学分析[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版), 2004, 28(6): 803-806. LI Dongmei, WANG Shuzong, WANG Deshi. Dynamic analysis of wobble-plate engine with different restriction[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2004, 28(6): 803-806. (in ChineseLI Dongmei, WANG Shuzong, WANG Deshi. Dynamic analysis of wobble-plate engine with different restriction[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2004, 28(6): 803-806. (in Chinese) [10] 杨成昱, 孙炯, 王德石. 基于空间机构学理论的摆盘发动机动力学分析[J]. 机械制造, 2006, 44(8): 32-34. YANG Chengyu, SUN Jiong, WANG Deshi. Dynamic analysis of wobble-plate engine based on spatial mechanism theory[J]. Machinery, 2006, 44(8): 32-34. (in ChineseYANG Chengyu, SUN Jiong, WANG Deshi. Dynamic analysis of wobble-plate engine based on spatial mechanism theory[J]. Machinery, 2006, 44(8): 32-34. (in Chinese) [11] 朱拥勇, 王德石. 摆盘空间机构振动力与振动力矩完全平衡研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2008, 19(11): 1343-1347. ZHU Yongyong, WANG Deshi. Analysis on complete balance of shaking forces and shaking moments with spatial wobble-plate mechanism[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2008, 19(11): 1343-1347. (in ChineseZHU Yongyong, WANG Deshi. Analysis on complete balance of shaking forces and shaking moments with spatial wobble-plate mechanism[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2008, 19(11): 1343-1347. (in Chinese) [12] 周铁军, 张翼, 苏江波, 等. 摆盘发动机摆盘机构的运动分析[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2014, 35(3): 157-160. ZHOU Tiejun, ZHANG Yi, SU Jiangbo, et al. Analyses on motion ofwobble-plate mechanism of the wobble-plate engine[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2014, 35(3): 157-160. (in ChineseZHOU Tiejun, ZHANG Yi, SU Jiangbo, et al. Analyses on motion ofwobble-plate mechanism of the wobble-plate engine[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2014, 35(3): 157-160. (in Chinese) [13] 曹浩, 文立华, 王志杰, 等. 水下航行器动力装置动力学特性研究[J]. 水下无人系统学报, 2019, 27(6): 673-679. CAO Hao, WEN Lihua, WANG Zhijie, et al. Dynamic characteristics of undersea vehicle power plant[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2019, 27(6): 673-679. (in ChineseCAO Hao, WEN Lihua, WANG Zhijie, et al. Dynamic characteristics of undersea vehicle power plant[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2019, 27(6): 673-679. (in Chinese) [14] 李鑫, 杨赪石, 彭博. 鱼雷转缸式斜盘发动机有限元分析[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2020, 42(3): 176-180. LI Xin, YANG Chengshi, PENG Bo. Finite element analysis of swashplate revoloving cylinder engine[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2020, 42(3): 176-180. (in ChineseLI Xin, YANG Chengshi, PENG Bo. Finite element analysis of swashplate revoloving cylinder engine[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2020, 42(3): 176-180. (in Chinese) [15] 孔岩峰, 单晓亮, 张振山. 基于神经网络与遗传算法的斜盘发动机弹性联轴器优化设计[J]. 机械传动, 2011, 35(8): 49-52. KONG Yanfeng, SHAN Xiaoliang, ZHANG Zhenshan. Optimization design of elastic coupling in swashplate engine based on BP-GA[J]. Journal of Mechanical Transmission, 2011, 35(8): 49-52. (in ChineseKONG Yanfeng, SHAN Xiaoliang, ZHANG Zhenshan. Optimization design of elastic coupling in swashplate engine based on BP-GA[J]. Journal of Mechanical Transmission, 2011, 35(8): 49-52. (in Chinese) [16] 张雨潇, 邓涛, 柳平, 等. 新型斜盘发动机设计与动力学仿真[J]. 机械传动, 2021, 45(8): 157-164. ZHANG Yuxiao, DENG Tao, LIU Ping, et al. Design and dynamics simulation of a new type of swashplate engine[J]. Journal of Mechanical Transmission, 2021, 45(8): 157-164. (in ChineseZHANG Yuxiao, DENG Tao, LIU Ping, et al. Design and dynamics simulation of a new type of swashplate engine[J]. Journal of Mechanical Transmission, 2021, 45(8): 157-164. (in Chinese) [17] 张雷, 徐海军, 张湘, 等. 高紧凑性交叉斜盘式功率传输机构的特性[J]. 中国机械工程, 2021, 32(18): 2165-2174. ZHANG Lei, XU Haijun, ZHANG Xiang, et al. Characteristics of high compact power transmission mechanisms of crossed swash-plates[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 32(18): 2165-2174. (in ChineseZHANG Lei, XU Haijun, ZHANG Xiang, et al. Characteristics of high compact power transmission mechanisms of crossed swash-plates[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 32(18): 2165-2174. (in Chinese) [18] 邓涛, 郑宇惟, 张雨潇, 等. 斜盘发动机摆盘机构参数对动力性能影响分析[J]. 机械传动, 2023, 47(6): 107-114. DENG Tao, ZHENG Yuwei, ZHANG Yuxiao, et al. Analysis of the influence of the parameters of the pendulum mechanism of the swashplate engine on the dynamic performance[J]. Journal of Mechanical Transmission, 2023, 47(6): 107-114. (in ChineseDENG Tao, ZHENG Yuwei, ZHANG Yuxiao, et al. Analysis of the influence of the parameters of the pendulum mechanism of the swashplate engine on the dynamic performance[J]. Journal of Mechanical Transmission, 2023, 47(6): 107-114. (in Chinese) [19] 洪嘉振, 刘铸永. 刚柔耦合动力学的建模方法[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2008, 42(11): 1922-1926. HONG Jiazhen, LIU Zhuyong. Modeling methods of rigid-flexible coupling dynamics[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2008, 42(11): 1922-1926. (in ChineseHONG Jiazhen, LIU Zhuyong. Modeling methods of rigid-flexible coupling dynamics[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2008, 42(11): 1922-1926. (in Chinese) -

下载: