留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

篦齿封严结构对压气机叶栅性能影响研究

徐文峰 邹世龙 任国哲 孙丹 鲁文昕

徐文峰, 邹世龙, 任国哲, 等. 篦齿封严结构对压气机叶栅性能影响研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(12):20240075 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240075
引用本文: 徐文峰, 邹世龙, 任国哲, 等. 篦齿封严结构对压气机叶栅性能影响研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(12):20240075 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240075
XU Wenfeng, ZOU Shilong, REN Guozhe, et al. Study on the influences of the labyrinth seal structure on the compressor cascade performance[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(12):20240075 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240075
Citation: XU Wenfeng, ZOU Shilong, REN Guozhe, et al. Study on the influences of the labyrinth seal structure on the compressor cascade performance[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(12):20240075 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240075

篦齿封严结构对压气机叶栅性能影响研究

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240075
基金项目: 沈阳航空航天大学引进人才科研启动基金(23YB20); 国家自然科学基金(52075346)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    徐文峰(1993-),男,讲师,博士,主要从事航空发动机气动热力学研究。E-mail:xuwf789@163.com

    通讯作者:

    孙丹(1981-),男,教授,博士,主要从事透平机械先进密封技术研究。E-mail:phd_sundan@163.com

  • 中图分类号: V233.5

Study on the influences of the labyrinth seal structure on the compressor cascade performance

  • 摘要:

    为探究篦齿封严对压气机叶栅性能影响,本文以高负荷压气机平面叶栅为研究对象,设计了5种不同篦齿封严结构,通过数值模拟方法探究5种篦齿封严结构对压气机叶栅性能和流场结构的影响规律。研究结果表明:随着篦齿容腔诱发的泄漏量逐渐增加,叶栅总压损失逐渐增加,叶片载荷能力逐渐减弱。不同篦齿封严结构通过减小间隙泄漏流量,改善叶栅通道内气流的流动状态,进而提高叶片载荷能力,降低通道内的流动损失。5种篦齿方案中,直齿加方块结构对叶栅流场结构和气动性能的改善效果最为显著,其通过阻断齿顶射流,增大齿顶流动阻力,降低篦齿泄漏流量,削弱篦齿泄漏流对吸力面角区分离流动的影响,能够使角区低能流体团缩小32.1%,抑制集中脱落涡影响范围,进而使总压损失降低20%。

     

  • 图 1  叶栅参数示意图

    Figure 1.  Cascade parameters diagram

    图 2  不同篦齿方案示意图

    Figure 2.  Schematic diagram of different labyrinth seal schemes

    图 3  计算网格和边界

    Figure 3.  Computational mesh and boundary

    图 4  网格无关性

    Figure 4.  Grid independence

    图 5  数值方法校核[25]

    Figure 5.  Numerical method check[25]

    图 6  不同方案的总压损失系数和泄漏量

    Figure 6.  Total pressure loss coefficient and leakage of different schemes

    图 7  各方案叶表静压系数曲线

    Figure 7.  Static pressure coefficient curves of each scheme on the blade surface

    图 8  不同方案出口总压损失系数沿叶高分布曲线

    Figure 8.  Distribution of the total pressure loss coefficient at the outlet along the blade height for different schemes

    图 9  不同方案出口气流角沿叶高分布

    Figure 9.  Distribution of outlet airflow angle along the blade height for different schemes

    图 10  不同方案总压损失系数云图

    Figure 10.  Contour of total pressure loss coefficient of different schemes

    图 11  吸力面角区低能流体团及总压损失系数分布

    Figure 11.  Distribution of low-energy fluid clusters and total pressure loss coefficients in the corner region

    图 12  端壁及叶表静压系数云图和极限流线

    Figure 12.  Static pressure coefficient contours and limiting streamlines on the end wall and blade surfaces

    图 13  不同方案涡系结构

    Figure 13.  Vortex structure of different schemes

    图 14  不同方案三维流线

    Figure 14.  Three-dimensional streamlines of different cases

    图 15  齿腔内流场结构图

    Figure 15.  Flow field structure in tooth cavity

    表  1  叶栅几何参数

    Table  1.   Cascade geometry parameters

    参数数值
    弦长 c/mm60
    叶高 H/mm100
    节距 t/mm33
    安装角 γ/(°)22.15
    几何进口角 α/(°)42
    几何出口角 β/(°)90
    进口马赫数 Ma0.7
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 钟兢军, 李晓东, 高宇. 跨声速级不同转速下静叶的损失特性[J]. 航空动力学报, 2017, 32(9): 2243-2252. ZHONG Jingjun, LI Xiaodong, GAO Yu. Loss characteristic of stator under different rotational speeds in transonic stage environment[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(9): 2243-2252. (in Chinese

    ZHONG Jingjun, LI Xiaodong, GAO Yu. Loss characteristic of stator under different rotational speeds in transonic stage environment[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(9): 2243-2252. (in Chinese)
    [2] CORRAL R, GRECO M, VEGA A. Tip-shroud labyrinth seal effect on the flutter stability of turbine rotor blades[J]. ASME Turbomach, 2019, 141(10): 101006. doi: 10.1115/1.4043962
    [3] 吴森林, 赵正, 王文琪, 等. 封严腔泄漏流对压气机性能影响的试验研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(6): 20230036. WU Senlin, ZHAO Zheng, WANG Wenqi, et al. Experimental study on the influence of seal chamber leakage flow on compressor performance[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(6): 20230036. (in Chinese

    WU Senlin, ZHAO Zheng, WANG Wenqi, et al. Experimental study on the influence of seal chamber leakage flow on compressor performance[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(6): 20230036. (in Chinese)
    [4] 刘高文, 陈凯, 刚铁, 等. 压比和雷诺数对压气机级间篦齿封严流动特性的影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2015, 30(7): 1554-1560. LIU Gaowen, CHEN Kai, GANG Tie, et al. Influences of pressure ratio and Reynolds number on flow characteristics of labyrinth seal in compressor stator well[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2015, 30(7): 1554-1560. (in Chinese

    LIU Gaowen, CHEN Kai, GANG Tie, et al. Influences of pressure ratio and Reynolds number on flow characteristics of labyrinth seal in compressor stator well[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2015, 30(7): 1554-1560. (in Chinese)
    [5] JEFFERSON J L, TURNER R C. Some shrouding and tip clearance effects in axial flow compressors1[J]. International Shipbuilding Progress, 1958, 5(42): 78-101.
    [6] TAYLOR D, LONGLEY J. Effects of stator platform geometry features on blade row performance[J]. Journal of the Global Power and Propulsion Society, 2019, 3: 609-629. doi: 10.33737/jgpps/111508
    [7] LIANG Dong, GUI Xingmin, JIN Donghai. Influence of seal cavity leakage flow on compressor performance investigated with a circumferentially averaged method[J]. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11(2): 780. doi: 10.3390/app11020780
    [8] WELLBORN S R. Effects of shrouded stator cavity flows on multistage axial compressor aerodynamic performance[D]. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University, 1996.
    [9] WELLBORN S R, OKIISHI T H. The influence of shrouded stator cavity flows on multistage compressor performance[C]// Proceedings of the International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition. Stockholm, Sweden: ASME, 1998: 1-15.
    [10] DEMARGNE A A J, LONGLEY J P. The aerodynamic interaction of stator shroud leakage and mainstream flows in compressors[C]// Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2000: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Volume 1: Aircraft Engine; Marine; Turbomachinery; Microturbines and Small Turbomachinery. Munich, Germany: ASME, 2000: 1-12.
    [11] LEJAMBRE C R, ZACHARIAS R M, BIEDERMAN B P, et al. Development and application of a multistage navier-stokes flow solver: Part Ⅱ application to a high pressure compressor design[C]//Proceedings of the ASME 1995 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition. Volume 1: Turbomachinery. Houston, Texas, US: ASME, 1998: 215-223.
    [12] HEIDEGGER N J, HALL E J, DELANEY R A. Parameterized study of high-speed compressor seal cavity flow[C]//32nd Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit.Lake Buena Vista, US: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1996: 2807.
    [13] WELLBORN S R, OKIISHI T H. The influence of shrouded stator cavity flows on multistage compressor performance[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1999, 121(3): 486-497. doi: 10.1115/1.2841341
    [14] WELLBORN S R, TOLCHINSKY I, OKIISHI T H. Modeling shrouded stator cavity flows in axial-flow compressors[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2000, 122(1): 55-61. doi: 10.1115/1.555427
    [15] ZHANG Wanfu, YANG Jiangang, LI Chun, et al. Comparison of leakage performance and fluid-induced force of turbine tip labyrinth seal and a new kind of radial annular seal[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2014, 105: 125-137.
    [16] KATO D, YAMAGAMI M, TSUCHIYA N, et al. The influence of shrouded stator cavity flows on the aerodynamic performance of a high-speed multistage axial-flow compressor[C]// Proceedings of the ASME 2011 Turbo Expo: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. Volume 7: Turbomachinery, Parts A, B, and C. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: ASME, 2011: 297-307.
    [17] 曹传军, 敖天翔, 庄皓琬, 等. 封严篦齿对轴流压气机涡系结构与流动损失的影响[J]. 热能动力工程, 2023, 38(6): 20-30. CAO Chuanjun, AO Tianxiang, ZHUANG Haowan, et al. Effect of labyrinth seal on vortex structure and flow loss of axial compressor[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2023, 38(6): 20-30. (in Chinese

    CAO Chuanjun, AO Tianxiang, ZHUANG Haowan, et al. Effect of labyrinth seal on vortex structure and flow loss of axial compressor[J]. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2023, 38(6): 20-30. (in Chinese)
    [18] 孟德君, 邢雷, 李坚. 篦齿封严流动及其对压气机静子性能的影响[J]. 航空发动机, 2013, 39(6): 31-35, 42. MENG Dejun, XING Lei, LI Jian. Influence of shrouded stator cavity flow on compressor stator performance[J]. Aeroengine, 2013, 39(6): 31-35, 42. (in Chinese

    MENG Dejun, XING Lei, LI Jian. Influence of shrouded stator cavity flow on compressor stator performance[J]. Aeroengine, 2013, 39(6): 31-35, 42. (in Chinese)
    [19] 傅鑫, 王婉月, 张衍, 等. 轴流压气机主流在封严篦齿上游容腔内流动结构的数值研究[J]. 兵工自动化, 2018, 37(7): 83-88. FU Xin, WANG Wanyue, ZHANG Yan, et al. Numerical simulation research of flow structure of axial compressor mainstream in upstream cavity[J]. Ordnance Industry Automation, 2018, 37(7): 83-88. (in Chinese

    FU Xin, WANG Wanyue, ZHANG Yan, et al. Numerical simulation research of flow structure of axial compressor mainstream in upstream cavity[J]. Ordnance Industry Automation, 2018, 37(7): 83-88. (in Chinese)
    [20] 王广, 楚武利. 级间进出口几何角度对压气机气动性能和封严效果的影响[J]. 推进技术, 2020, 41(5): 1063-1071. WANG Guang, CHU Wuli. Influence of geometric angle of inter-stage inlet and outlet on aerodynamic performance and sealing of compressor[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2020, 41(5): 1063-1071. (in Chinese

    WANG Guang, CHU Wuli. Influence of geometric angle of inter-stage inlet and outlet on aerodynamic performance and sealing of compressor[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2020, 41(5): 1063-1071. (in Chinese)
    [21] 陈美宁, 谢伟亮, 王红涛. 静子容腔泄漏对某压气机性能影响的数值研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2014, 29(11): 2543-2549. CHEN Meining, XIE Weiliang, WANG Hongtao. Numerical investigation of stator cavity leakage influence to a compressor performance[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2014, 29(11): 2543-2549. (in Chinese

    CHEN Meining, XIE Weiliang, WANG Hongtao. Numerical investigation of stator cavity leakage influence to a compressor performance[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2014, 29(11): 2543-2549. (in Chinese)
    [22] 陈雷. 压气机静子叶根间隙泄漏特性研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2010. CHEN Lei. Study on leakage characteristics of compressor stator blade root clearance[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2010. (in Chinese

    CHEN Lei. Study on leakage characteristics of compressor stator blade root clearance[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2010. (in Chinese)
    [23] 孔晓治, 黄天硕, 刘育心, 等. 不同来流附面层厚度下容腔泄漏流对围带式静叶性能影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2023, 38(1): 20220445. KONG Xiaozhi, HUANG Tianshuo, LIU Yuxin, et al. Influences of the cavity leakage flow on shrouded stator performance at different inlet boundary layer thicknesses[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2023, 38(1): 20220445. (in Chinese

    KONG Xiaozhi, HUANG Tianshuo, LIU Yuxin, et al. Influences of the cavity leakage flow on shrouded stator performance at different inlet boundary layer thicknesses[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2023, 38(1): 20220445. (in Chinese)
    [24] XU Wenfeng, SUN Peng, YANG Guogang. Effect of the bionic chamber position on the aerodynamic performance in a transonic compressor cascade[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 119: 107106. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.107106
    [25] 杨益. 叶表凹坑影响高负荷扩压叶栅气动性能研究[D]. 大连: 大连海事大学, 2018. YANG Yi. Study on the influence of blade surface pits on aerodynamic performance of high load compressor cascade[D]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University, 2018. (in Chinese

    YANG Yi. Study on the influence of blade surface pits on aerodynamic performance of high load compressor cascade[D]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University, 2018. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中
图(15) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  359
  • HTML浏览量:  342
  • PDF量:  41
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-02-04
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-09-24

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回