留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

叶片依附式涡流发生器对压气机转子叶栅的流动控制

宋天楚 王萌 陈小虎 王忠义

宋天楚, 王萌, 陈小虎, 等. 叶片依附式涡流发生器对压气机转子叶栅的流动控制[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(7):20240234 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240234
引用本文: 宋天楚, 王萌, 陈小虎, 等. 叶片依附式涡流发生器对压气机转子叶栅的流动控制[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(7):20240234 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240234
SONG Tianchu, WANG Meng, CHEN Xiaohu, et al. Flow control of compressor rotor cascade by blade-attached vortex generator[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(7):20240234 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240234
Citation: SONG Tianchu, WANG Meng, CHEN Xiaohu, et al. Flow control of compressor rotor cascade by blade-attached vortex generator[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(7):20240234 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240234

叶片依附式涡流发生器对压气机转子叶栅的流动控制

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240234
基金项目: 国家科技重大专项(J2019-Ⅲ-0017-0061); 国家自然科学基金(52101348)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    宋天楚(2000-),男,博士生,主要研究方向为压气机内部流动。E-mail:2018030721@hrbeu.edu.cn

    通讯作者:

    王萌(1991-),男,副教授,博士,主要研究方向为压气机内部流动。E-mail:wangmeng_a@hrbeu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: V232.4

Flow control of compressor rotor cascade by blade-attached vortex generator

  • 摘要:

    提出基于叶片依附式楔形涡流发生器(VG)的压气机叶栅内部流动控制方法,并开展三维稳态雷诺平均Navier-Stokes(RANS)方法对其进行数值仿真研究。对4种不同形状方案的VG叶栅性能开展计算并分析内部流动,研究结果表明:倒置对称方案的VG可以有效改善叶栅性能。不同形状的VG均可以抑制激波/附面层干扰分离,但控制效果相差明显。在弯曲的压气机叶栅通道中,倒置方案的VG涡紧贴吸力面,控制效果强于VG涡远离吸力面的正置方案。对称方案产生的VG涡对强度低可以沿轴向抑制激波/附面层干扰分离,非对称方案产生的VG涡强度高可以沿轴向和展向抑制分离,但会伴随更大的静压损失。因此综合VG的分离抑制效果和其本身引入的负面影响,倒置对称方案更适用于控制压气机叶栅内部的流动分离。

     

  • 图 1  原始叶栅主要参数

    Figure 1.  Main parameters of original cascade

    图 2  ARL-SL19计算域及网格

    Figure 2.  ARL-SL19 domain and grid

    图 3  叶片周围y+

    Figure 3.  y+ around the blade

    图 4  叶片周围等熵马赫数

    Figure 4.  Isentropic Mach number around blade

    图 5  激波结构(纹影)

    Figure 5.  Shockwave structure (schlieren)

    图 6  原型叶栅计算域及网格

    Figure 6.  Original cascade domain and grid

    图 7  原型叶栅网格无关性验证

    Figure 7.  Original cascade grid independence verification

    图 8  原型叶栅特性线

    Figure 8.  Performance map of original cascade

    图 9  典型工况马赫数分布

    Figure 9.  Mach number distribution on the typical conditions

    图 10  不同形状VG

    Figure 10.  VG with different shapes

    图 11  VG叶栅网格

    Figure 11.  Grid of VG cascade

    图 12  不同形状方案叶栅特性线

    Figure 12.  Cascade performance map of different shape schemes

    图 13  VG涡流线

    Figure 13.  Streamline of VG vortices

    图 14  吸力面流线

    Figure 14.  Streamline on suction surface

    图 15  VG涡核

    Figure 15.  Vortex core of VG vortices

    图 16  流向壁面切应力和速度

    Figure 16.  Streamwise wall shear and velocity

    图 17  吸力面壁面切应力

    Figure 17.  Local wall shear on suction surface

    图 18  吸力面附近回流区体积

    Figure 18.  Backflow volume near suction surface

    图 19  叶片通道出口总压损失系数

    Figure 19.  Total pressure loss coefficient at blade passage outlet

    图 20  吸力面压力系数

    Figure 20.  Pressure coefficient on suction surface

    图 21  沿程压力系数

    Figure 21.  Streamwise pressure coefficient

    图 22  叶栅流场参数

    Figure 22.  Flow parameters of cascades

    表  1  原始叶栅参数

    Table  1.   Parameters of original cascade

    参数数值
    轴向弦长 Cax/mm35.9
    栅距 t/mm37.6
    安装角 βs/(°)39.9
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] DOLLING D. S. Fifty years of shockwave/boundary-layer interaction research-What next?[J]. AIAA Journal,2001,39: 1517-1531. doi: 10.2514/2.1476
    [2] ITO Y,YAMAMOTO K,KUSUNOSE K,et al. Effect of vortex generators on transonic swept wings[J]. Journal of Aircraft,2016,53(6): 1890-1904.
    [3] GAGEIK M,NIES J,KLIOUTCHNIKOV I,et al. Pressure wave damping in transonic airfoil flow by means of micro vortex generators[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology,2018,81: 65-77.
    [4] HUANG W,WU H,YANG Y. G,et al. Recent advances in the shock wave/boundary layer interaction and its control in internal and external flows[J]. Acta Astronautica,2020,174: 103-122.
    [5] LEE S,LOTH E. Supersonic boundary-layer interactions with various micro-vortex generator geometries[J]. The Aeronautical Journal,2009,113(1149): 683-697. doi: 10.1017/S0001924000003353
    [6] ZHANG B B,ZHAO Q J,XIANG X R,et al. An improved micro-vortex generator in supersonic flows[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology,2015,47: 210-215.
    [7] GHOSH S,CHOI J. I,EDWARDS J. R. Numerical simulations of effects of micro vortex generators using immersed-boundary methods[J]. AIAA Journal,2010,48(1): 92-103.
    [8] FALEMPIN F,FIRSOV A A,YARANTSEV D A,et al. Plasma control of shock wave configuration in off-design mode of M=2 inlet[J]. Experiments in Fluids,2015,56(3): 54.
    [9] SUN Q,LI Y H,CUI W,et al. Shock wave-boundary layer interactions control by plasma aerodynamic actuation[J]. Science China Technological Sciences,2014,57(7): 1335-1341.
    [10] SHENG J M,WU Y,ZHANG H D,et al. Flow control effect of spanwise distributed pulsed arc discharge plasma actuation on supersonic compressor cascade flow[J]. Journal of Thermal Science,2022,31(5): 1723-1733.
    [11] CAO Z Y,SONG C,GAO X,et al. Computational study on the boundary layer suction effects in the supersonic compressor flow with a bowed blade[J]. Journal of Thermal Science,2022,31(2): 511-528.
    [12] CAO Z Y,GAO X,ZHANG T,et al. Flow mechanism and aspiration strategies in an ultra-highly loaded supersonic compressor cascade[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology,2020,104: 105989.
    [13] WANG Z A,CHANG J T,ZHANG J L,et al. Investigations on flowfield behavior and resistance backpressure characteristics of supersonic cascade with boundary layer suction[J]. Acta Astronautica,2018,152: 588-601.
    [14] WANG Z A,CHANG J T,LI Y F. Investigation of shock wave control by suction in a supersonic cascade[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology,2021,108(1): 106382.1-106382.19.
    [15] KLINNER J,HERGT A,GRUND S,et al. Experimental investigation of shock-induced separation and flow control in a transonic compressor cascade[J]. Experiments in Fluids,2019,60(6): 96.
    [16] MA J C,YANG G,ZHOU L,et al. Effect of a blade end slot on supersonic compressor cascade hub-corner separation[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology,2021,118: 107032.
    [17] ZHU Y X,LUO Z B,PENG W Q,et al. The influence of steady air jet on the trailing-edge shock loss in a supersonic compressor cascade[J]. Aerospace,2022,9(11): 713.
    [18] ZHU Y X,PENG W Q,LUO Z B,et al. Trailing-edge shock loss control with self-sustaining synthetic jet in a supersonic compressor cascade[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics,2023,36(7): 366-377.
    [19] REID R D,MOORE L. Design and overall performance of four highly loaded,high-speed inlet stages for an advanced high-pressure ratio core compressor[R]. NASA Technical Paper 1337,1978.
    [20] TWEEDT D L,SCHREIBER H A,STARKEN H. Experimental investigation of the performance of a supersonic compressor cascade[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery,1988,110(4): 456-466.
    [21] CASONI M,MAGRINI A,BENINI E. Supersonic compressor cascade shape optimization under multiple inlet Mach operating conditions[J]. Aerospace,2019,6(6): 64.
    [22] LIU B J,SHI H T,YU X J. A new method for rapid shock loss evaluation and reduction for the optimization design of a supersonic compressor cascade[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers: Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering,2018,232(13): 2458-2476.
    [23] WANG Z. Y,SONG T C,CHEN X H,et al. Control on SWBLI by vortex generator in a supersonic cascade[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology,2024,151: 109323.
  • 加载中
图(22) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  455
  • HTML浏览量:  239
  • PDF量:  37
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-08-02
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-11-11

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回