留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

布孔格尼襟翼对直升机旋翼悬停性能提升的研究

王天健 韩东 崔钊

王天健, 韩东, 崔钊. 布孔格尼襟翼对直升机旋翼悬停性能提升的研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2026, 41(1):20240268 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240268
引用本文: 王天健, 韩东, 崔钊. 布孔格尼襟翼对直升机旋翼悬停性能提升的研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2026, 41(1):20240268 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240268
WANG Tianjian, HAN Dong, CUI Zhao. Perforated Gurney flaps to improve hovering performance of helicopter rotors[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2026, 41(1):20240268 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240268
Citation: WANG Tianjian, HAN Dong, CUI Zhao. Perforated Gurney flaps to improve hovering performance of helicopter rotors[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2026, 41(1):20240268 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240268

布孔格尼襟翼对直升机旋翼悬停性能提升的研究

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240268
基金项目: 主动控制旋翼技术研究项目(FKFB20231108055); 国家自然科学基金(11972181)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    王天健(1999-),男,硕士生,主要从事旋翼与直升机总体性能研究。E-mail:freljord@nuaa.edu.cn

    通讯作者:

    韩东(1980-),男,教授,博士,主要从事直升机动力学及其控制、智能旋翼及旋翼飞行器飞行性能等方面的研究。E-mail:donghan@nuaa.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: V211.52

Perforated Gurney flaps to improve hovering performance of helicopter rotors

  • 摘要:

    对布孔格尼襟翼提升直升机旋翼悬停性能进行了研究,首先采用计算流体动力学(CFD)方法对布孔格尼襟翼的气动特性进行了探讨,建立了加装布孔格尼襟翼的翼型气动模型,在此基础上,将该模型与直升机飞行性能分析模型相耦合,分析了直升机旋翼加装布孔格尼襟翼后的性能提升。结果表明:布孔格尼襟翼上的孔洞射流作用打断了尾缘脱落涡,从而降低了阻力、提升了升阻比。悬停性能分析结果表明:桨叶加装格尼襟翼后,以略微牺牲轻载时性能为代价,能有效提升大载荷时悬停效率并降低需用功率,降低旋翼桨叶迎角,改善桨叶承载分布,且布孔格尼襟翼对性能的提升效果随安装位置向外扩展而增加明显。2%弦长高度、23%孔隙度、加装在桨叶展向80%~95%半径位置的布孔格尼襟翼,在大载荷时可将悬停效率提升10.60%,功率消耗减小10.00%。将旋翼最大拉力提升5.17%,对应悬停效率提升7.82%。

     

  • 图 1  二维和三维网格及模型

    Figure 1.  2D and 3D mesh and model

    图 2  二维[17]及三维[11]CFD方法验证

    Figure 2.  2D[17] and 3D[11] CFD method validation

    图 3  布孔方式对格尼襟翼气动特性影响

    Figure 3.  Holes’ geometry influence on aerodynamic characteristics of Gurney flap

    图 4  加装格尼襟翼的旋翼桨叶[6]

    Figure 4.  Rotor blade equipped with Gurney flap[6]

    图 5  格尼襟翼几何参数

    Figure 5.  Gurney flap geometry parameters

    图 6  公式预测布孔格尼襟翼升力系数

    Figure 6.  Formula prediction of lift coefficient of perforated Gurney flap

    图 7  公式预测布孔格尼襟翼阻力系数

    Figure 7.  Formula prediction of drag coefficient of perforated Gurney flap

    图 8  直升机悬停性能模型验证

    Figure 8.  Helicopter hover performance model validation

    图 9  悬停效率曲线

    Figure 9.  Merit curve in hover

    图 10  孔格尼襟翼于旋翼桨叶上加装方案

    Figure 10.  Perforated Gurney flap installation sets in rotor blades

    图 11  布孔格尼襟翼对悬停效率影响

    Figure 11.  Perforated Gurney flaps’ influence on figure of merit

    图 12  布孔格尼襟翼对需用功率影响

    Figure 12.  Perforated Gurney flaps’ influence on power required

    图 13  布孔格尼襟翼对旋翼最大拉力和悬停效率影响

    Figure 13.  Perforated Gurney flaps’ influence on the maximum thrust and figure of merit

    图 14  布孔格尼襟翼对旋翼桨盘迎角分布影响

    Figure 14.  Perforated Gurney flaps’ influence on angle of attack of rotor disc

    表  1  CFD参数设置

    Table  1.   CFD settings

    参数 数值
    二维验证 三维验证
    翼型弦长/m 1 0.15
    格尼襟翼高度与翼型弦长之比/% 0,2,3 6.7
    孔隙度/% 0,23
    雷诺数/105 21 2.32
    第1层网格高度/10−5m 2.4 2.5
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  布孔格尼襟翼孔洞几何参数设置

    Table  2.   Perforated Gurney flap geometry sets

    编号 示意图 相关参数/mm
    R a b

    C1


    C2

    0.8


    1.08

    1.8


    2.5

    2.4


    3.2
    S1 1.62 3.75 2.5
    S2 1.62 3.75 5
    S3 1.62 3.75 7.5
    S4 1.45 3 5
    S5 2.16 6.67 5
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  UH-60A直升机主要参数

    Table  3.   UH-60A helicopter main parameters

    参数 数值及详情
    旋翼 半径/m 8.178
    翼型 SC 1095/SC 1094R8
    桨叶片数 4
    转速/(rad/s) 27.0
    弦长/m 0.5273
    挥舞铰偏置/m 0.3817
    尾桨 半径/m 1.6764
    翼型 SC 1095
    桨叶片数 4
    转速/(rad/s) 124.62
    弦长/m 0.2469
    负扭/(°) −18.0
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] LIEBECK R H. Design of subsonic airfoils for high lift[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1978, 15(9): 547-561. doi: 10.2514/3.58406
    [2] NEUHART D, PENDERGRAFT O C. A water tunnel study of Gurney flaps[R]. Hampton, US: Langley Research Center, NASA-TM-4071, 1988.
    [3] JANG C S. Incompressible Navier-Stokes computations of an airfoil with a Gurney flap[D]. San Luis Obispo, US: California Polytechnic State University, 1992.
    [4] JEFFREY D R M. An investigation into the aerodynamics of Gurney flaps [D]. Southampton, US: University of Southampton, 1998.
    [5] KENTFIELD J. The potential of Gurney flaps for improving the aerodynamic performance of helicopter rotors[R]. AIAA-1993-4883, 1993.
    [6] GIBERTINI G, ZANOTTI A, DROANDI G, et al. Experimental investigation of a helicopter rotor with Gurney flaps[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 2017, 121(1236): 191-212. doi: 10.1017/aer.2016.120
    [7] DEHAEZE F, BAVERSTOCK K D, BARAKOS G N. CFD simulation of flapped rotors[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 2015, 119(1222): 1561-1583. doi: 10.1017/S0001924000011404
    [8] YEE K, JOO W, LEE D H. Aerodynamic performance analysis of a Gurney flap for rotorcraft application[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2007, 44(3): 1003-1014. doi: 10.2514/1.26868
    [9] 张勇刚, 崔钊, 韩东, 等. 加装格尼襟翼旋翼的直升机飞行性能[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(7): 2208-2217. ZHANG Yonggang, CUI Zhao, HAN Dong, et al. Flight performance of helicopter rotors with Gurney flaps[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(7): 2208-2217. (in Chinese

    ZHANG Yonggang, CUI Zhao, HAN Dong, et al. Flight performance of helicopter rotors with Gurney flaps[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(7): 2208-2217. (in Chinese)
    [10] STACEY S, CONNOLLY N, COURT P. Leonardo helicopter active rotor programmes to improve helicopter comfort & performance[R]. Phoenix, US: 74th American Helicopter Society International Annual Forum and Technology Display, 2018.
    [11] KO L S. An experimental investigation of airfoils with perforated Gurney-type flaps[D]. Montréal, Canada: McGill University, 2011.
    [12] LEE T. Aerodynamic characteristics of airfoil with perforated Gurney-type flaps[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2009, 46(2): 542-548. doi: 10.2514/1.38474
    [13] PURSER P E, TURNER T R. Aerodynamic characteristics and flap loads of perforated double split flaps on a rectangular NACA 23012 airfoil[R]. Washington, US: Langley Memorial Aeronautical Laboratory, NACA-WR-L-415, 1943.
    [14] MEYER R, HAGE W, BECHERT D W, et al. Drag reduction on Gurney flaps by three-dimensional modifications[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2006, 43(1): 132-140. doi: 10.2514/1.14294
    [15] TRAUB L W, MILLER A C, REDINIOTIS O. Preliminary parametric study of Gurney flap dependencies[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2006, 43(4): 1242-1244. doi: 10.2514/1.13852
    [16] KAMNIS S, KONTIS K. Numerical studies on the application of synthetic jets for the active control of subsonic flow configurations[R]. AIAA-2004-2609, 2004.
    [17] LI Yachen, WANG Jinjun, ZHANG Panfeng. Effects of Gurney flaps on a NACA0012 airfoil[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2002, 68(1): 27-39. doi: 10.1023/A:1015679408150
    [18] BACH A B, PECHLIVANOGLOU G, NAYERI C, et al. Wake vortex field of an airfoil equipped with an active finite Gurney flap[R]. AIAA-2015-1271, 2015.
    [19] LIU Tianshu, MONTEFORT J. Thin-airfoil theoretical interpretation for Gurney flap lift enhancement[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2007, 44(2): 667-671. doi: 10.2514/1.27680
    [20] HAN Dong, DONG Chen, BARAKOS G N. Performance improvement of variable speed rotors by Gurney flaps[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 81: 118-127. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.07.044
    [21] 高正, 陈仁良. 直升机飞行动力学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003: 65-75.
    [22] HILBERT K B. A mathematical model of the UH-60 helicopter[R]. Moffett Field, US: AMSE Research Center, NASA-TM-85890, 1984.
    [23] YEO H, BOUSMAN W G, JOHNSON W. Performance analysis of a utility helicopter with standard and advanced rotors[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2004, 49(3): 250-270. doi: 10.4050/JAHS.49.250
    [24] NAGATA J, PIOTROWSKI J L, YOUNG C J. Basline performance verification of the 12th year production UH-60A black hawk helicopter[R]. Washington, US: United States Department of the Army, ADA208671, 1989.
  • 加载中
图(14) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  488
  • HTML浏览量:  372
  • PDF量:  23
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-04-29
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-10-23

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回