Flow and thrust characteristics of annular slot dual-bell nozzle
-
摘要:
针对双钟型喷管的抽吸阻力以及过早模态转换等推力损失问题,开展了在喷管型面转折点处增设引射通道的环槽双钟型喷管设计。利用数值模拟方法对逆压梯度扩展段的双钟型喷管与环槽双钟型喷管的流动与推力特性进行了研究。研究结果表明:环槽双钟型喷管能够有效提高双钟型喷管在低压比条件下的推力性能与其模态转换压比。主流与引射气流间的剪切层动量传递作用是提高环槽双钟型喷管推力的重要原因,在环槽双钟型喷管中同样存在喷管潜行过渡过程。与双钟型喷管相比在海平面状态其推力系数提高了2.9%,在模态转换状态提高了10.4%,在高空模态受到环槽结构影响降低了0.2%。与基础喷管相比,在0~30 km高度范围内环槽双钟型喷管的高度平均比冲增加了1.7%。
Abstract:In view of the aspiration drag of dual-bell nozzles and the thrust loss problem such as premature mode transition, an annular slot dual-bell nozzle with an ejection annular slot added at the nozzle inflection point was designed. The flow and thrust characteristics of a dual-bell nozzle with an extension nozzle of positive pressure gradient and a dual-bell nozzle with an annular slot were investigated using numerical simulation methods. The results showed that the annular slot dual-bell nozzle can effectively improve the thrust performance of the dual-bell nozzle under low nozzle pressure ratio conditions and its mode transition pressure ratio. The shear layer momentum transport between the mainstream and the ejected airflow acted as an important reason for increasing the thrust of the annular slot dual-bell nozzle, and the sneak transition also existed in the annular slot dual-bell nozzle. Compared with the dual-bell nozzle, the thrust coefficient increased by 2.9% in the sea level mode, increased by 10.4% in the mode transition process, and reduced by 0.2% in the altitude mode influenced by the annular slot structure. Compared with the base nozzle, the altitude average specific impulse of the annular slot dual-bell nozzle increased by 1.7% within the 0—30 km altitude range.
-
Key words:
- dual-bell nozzle /
- sneak transition /
- modes transition /
- over-expanded /
- ejection flow
-
表 1 PPE-DBN关键几何参数
Table 1. Critical geometrical parameters of PPE-DBN
参数 数值 喉部半径rth/mm 100 基础段面积比${\varepsilon _{\text{b}}}$ 40 总面积比${\varepsilon _{\text{e}}}$ 100 基础段长度Lb 16rth 扩展段长度Le 14rth 基础段出口扩张角${\theta _{\text{b}}}$/(°) 8.75 型面转折角$\alpha $/(°) 16.67 扩展段出口扩张角${\theta _{\text{e}}}$/(°) 5.65 扩展段压力梯度k/(kPa/m) 3 表 2 PPE-DBN和Slot-DBN在NPR为85和
1700 条件下的推力系数Table 2. Thrust coefficients of PPE-DBN and Slot-DBN at NPR of 85 and
1700 NPR 喷管 CF CFd CFs 85 PPE-DBN 0.8170 0.8249 − 0.0079 Slot-DBN 0.8409 0.8352 0.0057 1700 PPE-DBN 0.9735 0.9564 0.0171 Slot-DBN 0.9714 0.9583 0.0131 -
[1] 王治军, 常新龙, 田干, 等. 液体火箭发动机推力室设计[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2014. [2] SCHMUCKER R H. Flow processes in overexpanded chemical rocket nozzles: part 2 side loads due to asymmetric separation[R]. NASA-TM-77395, 1984. [3] BAARS W J, TINNEY C E, RUF J H, et al. Wall pressure unsteadiness and side loads in overexpanded rocket nozzles[J]. AIAA Journal, 2012, 50(1): 61-73. doi: 10.2514/1.J051075 [4] HAGEMANN G, IMMICH H, VAN NGUYEN T, et al. Advanced rocket nozzles[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1998, 14(5): 620-634. doi: 10.2514/2.5354 [5] TAYLOR N V, HEMPSELL C M, MACFARLANE J, et al. Experimental investigation of the evacuation effect in expansion deflection nozzles[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2010, 66(3/4): 550-562. [6] FREY M, HAGEMANN G. Critical assessment of dual-bell nozzles[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1999, 15(1): 137-143. doi: 10.2514/2.5402 [7] HAGEMANN G, TERHARDT M, HAESELER D, et al. Experimental and analytical design verification of the dual-bell concept[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2002, 18(1): 116-122. doi: 10.2514/2.5905 [8] STARK R, GÉNIN C, SCHNEIDER D, et al. Ariane 5 performance optimization using dual-bell nozzle extension[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2016, 53(4): 743-750. doi: 10.2514/1.A33363 [9] MEISS J H, BESNARD E. Numerical analysis of curved thrusters for multichamber aerospike engines in flight conditions[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2017, 33(4): 1002-1019. doi: 10.2514/1.B36332 [10] EMELYANOV V, VOLKOV K, YAKOVCHUK M. Unsteady flow simulation of compressible turbulent flow in dual-bell nozzle with movement of extendible section from its initial to working position[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2022, 194: 514-523. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.10.007 [11] NÜRNBERGER-GÉNIN C, STARK R. Experimental study on flow transition in dual bell nozzles[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2010, 26(3): 497-502. doi: 10.2514/1.47282 [12] KBAB H, SELLAM M, HAMITOUCHE T, et al. Design and performance evaluation of a dual bell nozzle[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2017, 130: 52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.10.015 [13] GENIN C, STARK R H. Side loads in subscale dual bell nozzles[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2011, 27(4): 828-837. doi: 10.2514/1.B34170 [14] HORN M, FISHER S. Dual-bell altitude compensating nozzles[R]. University Park, US: NASA Propulsion Engineering Research Center, 1993. [15] 王一白, 覃粒子, 刘宇, 等. 高度补偿喷管的氢氧热试研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2007, 22(2): 316-322. WANG Yibai, QIN Lizi, LIU Yu, et al. Hydrogen/oxygen hot-firing tests of altitude compensating nozzles[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2007, 22(2): 316-322. (in ChineseWANG Yibai, QIN Lizi, LIU Yu, et al. Hydrogen/oxygen hot-firing tests of altitude compensating nozzles[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2007, 22(2): 316-322. (in Chinese) [16] 杨建文, 付秀文, 刘亚洲, 等. 不同设计型面对双钟形喷管性能影响[J]. 火箭推进, 2021, 47(5): 14-21. YANG Jianwen, FU Xiuwen, LIU Yazhou, et al. Influence on performance of dual-bell nozzle with different design contours[J]. Journal of Rocket Propulsion, 2021, 47(5): 14-21. (in ChineseYANG Jianwen, FU Xiuwen, LIU Yazhou, et al. Influence on performance of dual-bell nozzle with different design contours[J]. Journal of Rocket Propulsion, 2021, 47(5): 14-21. (in Chinese) [17] LEGROS B, LEGER L, KOURTA A, et al. Parametrical investigation of transverse injection in a dual-bell nozzle during altitude-varying conditions[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2023, 39(6): 875-885. doi: 10.2514/1.B39077 [18] ZMIJANOVIC V, LEGER L, SELLAM M, et al. Assessment of transition regimes in a dual-bell nozzle and possibility of active fluidic control[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 82/83: 1-8. [19] LÉGER L, ZMIJANOVIC V, SELLAM M, et al. Experimental investigation of forced flow regime transition in a dual bell nozzle by secondary fluidic injection[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2021, 89: 108818. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2021.108818 [20] FERRERO A, CONTE A, MARTELLI E, et al. Dual-bell nozzle with fluidic control of transition for space launchers[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2022, 193: 130-137. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.12.048 [21] PROSCHANKA D, YONEZAWA K, KOGA H, et al. Control of operation mode transition in dual-bell nozzles with film cooling[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2012, 28(3): 517-529. doi: 10.2514/1.B34202 [22] SEMENOV V, IVANOV I, KRYUKOV I. Dual bell slot nozzle of a rocket engine[J]. Perm National Research Polytechnic University Aerospace Engineering Bulletin, 2016(46): 56-72. doi: 10.15593/2224-9982/2016.46.03 [23] ZUCROW M J, HOFFMAN J D. Gas dynamics: volume 2 multidimensional flow[M]. New York, US: John Wiley and Sons Inc, 1977. [24] 刘亚洲, 李钰航, 胡海峰, 等. 延伸段压强分布对双钟形喷管模态转换速率的影响机理[J]. 固体火箭技术, 2024, 47(1): 44-53. LIU Yazhou, LI Yuhang, HU Haifeng, et al. Influence mechanism of wall pressure distribution in extension section on the mode transition rate of dual-bell nozzles[J]. Journal of Solid Rocket Technology, 2024, 47(1): 44-53. (in ChineseLIU Yazhou, LI Yuhang, HU Haifeng, et al. Influence mechanism of wall pressure distribution in extension section on the mode transition rate of dual-bell nozzles[J]. Journal of Solid Rocket Technology, 2024, 47(1): 44-53. (in Chinese) [25] 刘亚洲, 李平, 陈宏玉, 等. 不同延伸段压力分布的双钟形喷管设计[J]. 航空动力学报, 2022, 37(2): 424-432. LIU Yazhou, LI Ping, CHEN Hongyu, et al. Design of dual-bell nozzles with different extension pressure distributions[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2022, 37(2): 424-432. (in ChineseLIU Yazhou, LI Ping, CHEN Hongyu, et al. Design of dual-bell nozzles with different extension pressure distributions[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2022, 37(2): 424-432. (in Chinese) [26] TOMITA T, TAKAHASHI M, SASAKI M, et al. Investigation on characteristics of conventional-nozzle-based altitude compensating nozzles by cold-flow tests[R]. AIAA-2006-4375, 2006. [27] ANDERSON B H. Assessment of an analytical procedure for predicting supersonic ejector nozzle performance[R]. NASA-TN-D-7601, 1974. [28] CIMINI M, MARTELLI E, BERNARDINI M. Numerical analysis of side-loads reduction in a sub-scale dual-bell rocket nozzle[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2021, 107(3): 551-574. doi: 10.1007/s10494-021-00243-4 [29] FREY M, HAGEMANN G. Restricted shock separation in rocket nozzles[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2000, 16(3): 478-484. doi: 10.2514/2.5593 [30] 蔡佳, 李子杰, 黄河峡, 等. 宽速域引射喷管巡航状态流动特性仿真[J]. 火箭推进, 2020, 46(6): 22-29. CAI Jia, LI Zijie, HUANG Hexia, et al. Numerical study on the flow characteristics of ejector nozzle with wide-speed range under cruise state[J]. Journal of Rocket Propulsion, 2020, 46(6): 22-29. (in ChineseCAI Jia, LI Zijie, HUANG Hexia, et al. Numerical study on the flow characteristics of ejector nozzle with wide-speed range under cruise state[J]. Journal of Rocket Propulsion, 2020, 46(6): 22-29. (in Chinese) -

下载: