留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

环槽双钟型喷管流动与推力特性

王勇 额日其太 孔博

王勇, 额日其太, 孔博. 环槽双钟型喷管流动与推力特性[J]. 航空动力学报, 2026, 41(3):20240288 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240288
引用本文: 王勇, 额日其太, 孔博. 环槽双钟型喷管流动与推力特性[J]. 航空动力学报, 2026, 41(3):20240288 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240288
WANG Yong, Eriqitai, KONG Bo. Flow and thrust characteristics of annular slot dual-bell nozzle[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2026, 41(3):20240288 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240288
Citation: WANG Yong, Eriqitai, KONG Bo. Flow and thrust characteristics of annular slot dual-bell nozzle[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2026, 41(3):20240288 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240288

环槽双钟型喷管流动与推力特性

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240288
详细信息
    作者简介:

    王勇(1995-),男,博士生,主要从事发动机先进排气系统设计研究。E-mail:wangyong999@buaa.edu.cn

    通讯作者:

    孔博(1990-),男,讲师,博士,主要从事发动机先进排气系统隐身及设计研究。E-mail:kong_bo1226@buaa.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: V434

Flow and thrust characteristics of annular slot dual-bell nozzle

  • 摘要:

    针对双钟型喷管的抽吸阻力以及过早模态转换等推力损失问题,开展了在喷管型面转折点处增设引射通道的环槽双钟型喷管设计。利用数值模拟方法对逆压梯度扩展段的双钟型喷管与环槽双钟型喷管的流动与推力特性进行了研究。研究结果表明:环槽双钟型喷管能够有效提高双钟型喷管在低压比条件下的推力性能与其模态转换压比。主流与引射气流间的剪切层动量传递作用是提高环槽双钟型喷管推力的重要原因,在环槽双钟型喷管中同样存在喷管潜行过渡过程。与双钟型喷管相比在海平面状态其推力系数提高了2.9%,在模态转换状态提高了10.4%,在高空模态受到环槽结构影响降低了0.2%。与基础喷管相比,在0~30 km高度范围内环槽双钟型喷管的高度平均比冲增加了1.7%。

     

  • 图 1  双钟型喷管示意图

    Figure 1.  Schematic design of dual-bell nozzle

    图 2  PPE-DBN型面

    Figure 2.  Contour of PPE-DBN

    图 3  Slot-DBN型面

    Figure 3.  Contour of Slot-DBN

    图 4  双钟型喷管计算域及对应边界条件

    Figure 4.  Computational domain and boundary condition of dual-bell nozzle

    图 5  不同网格数下双钟型喷管出口压力分布(NPR为1700

    Figure 5.  Exit pressure distribution of dual-bell nozzle for different grid numbers (NPR of 1700

    图 6  双钟型喷管壁面压力实验验证结果

    Figure 6.  Validation of wall pressure with experimental results of dual-bell nozzle

    图 7  双钟型喷管流动分离点位置实验验证结果

    Figure 7.  Validation of flow separation point location with experimental results of dual-bell nozzle

    图 8  引射喷管壁面压力实验验证结果

    Figure 8.  Validation of nozzle wall pressure with experimental results

    图 9  PPE-DBN壁面压力分布

    Figure 9.  Wall pressure distribution of PPE-DBN

    图 10  PPE-DBN典型NPR下的马赫数云图

    Figure 10.  Mach number contours of PPE-DBN under different NPR

    图 11  低压比条件下PPE-DBN的推力系数及流动分离位置

    Figure 11.  Thrust coefficient and flow separation position of PPE-DBN under low nozzle pressure ratio conditions

    图 12  Slot-DBN在NPR为85条件下的马赫数云图

    Figure 12.  Mach number contour of Slot-DBN at NPR of 85

    图 13  Slot-DBN典型流线上马赫数、静压和总压分布(NPR为85)

    Figure 13.  Mach number, static pressure and total pressure distributions on Slot-DBN typical streamlines (NPR of 85)

    图 14  Slot-DBN在潜行过渡压比条件下的马赫数云图

    Figure 14.  Mach number contours of Slot-DBN under sneak transition nozzle pressure ratio conditions

    图 15  Slot-DBN在NPR为300条件下的马赫数云图

    Figure 15.  Mach number contour of Slot-DBN at NPR of 300

    图 16  Slot-DBN典型流线上马赫数、静压和总压分布(NPR为300)

    Figure 16.  Mach number, static pressure and total pressure distributions on Slot-DBN typical streamlines (NPR of 300)

    图 17  Slot-DBN在NPR为1700条件下的马赫数及密度梯度云图

    Figure 17.  Mach number and density gradient contours of Slot-DBN at NPR of 1700

    图 18  Slot-DBN典型流线上马赫数、静压和总压分布(NPR为1700

    Figure 18.  Mach number, static pressure and total pressure distributions on Slot-DBN typical streamlines (NPR of 1700

    图 19  不同NPR条件下的环槽通道内压力及轴向速度

    Figure 19.  Pressure and axial velocity in the annular slot channel under different NPR conditions

    图 20  低压比条件下Slot-DBN与PPE-DBN的推力系数

    Figure 20.  Thrust coefficients of Slot-DBN and PPE-DBN under low nozzle pressure ratio conditions

    图 21  不同压比条件下Slot-DBN的引射系数及推力系数增量

    Figure 21.  Ejector coefficient and thrust coefficient increments of Slot-DBN at different nozzle pressure ratios

    图 22  PPE-DBN和Slot-DBN的壁面压力分布(NPR为85)

    Figure 22.  Wall pressure distribution for PPE-DBN and Slot-DBN (NPR of 85)

    图 23  Slot-DBN在NPR为8500条件下的马赫数云图

    Figure 23.  Mach number contour of Slot-DBN at NPR of 8500

    表  1  PPE-DBN关键几何参数

    Table  1.   Critical geometrical parameters of PPE-DBN

    参数数值
    喉部半径rth/mm100
    基础段面积比${\varepsilon _{\text{b}}}$40
    总面积比${\varepsilon _{\text{e}}}$100
    基础段长度Lb16rth
    扩展段长度Le14rth
    基础段出口扩张角${\theta _{\text{b}}}$/(°)8.75
    型面转折角$\alpha $/(°)16.67
    扩展段出口扩张角${\theta _{\text{e}}}$/(°)5.65
    扩展段压力梯度k/(kPa/m)3
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  PPE-DBN和Slot-DBN在NPR为85和1700条件下的推力系数

    Table  2.   Thrust coefficients of PPE-DBN and Slot-DBN at NPR of 85 and 1700

    NPR 喷管 CF CFd CFs
    85 PPE-DBN 0.8170 0.8249 0.0079
    Slot-DBN 0.8409 0.8352 0.0057
    1700 PPE-DBN 0.9735 0.9564 0.0171
    Slot-DBN 0.9714 0.9583 0.0131
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 王治军, 常新龙, 田干, 等. 液体火箭发动机推力室设计[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2014.
    [2] SCHMUCKER R H. Flow processes in overexpanded chemical rocket nozzles: part 2 side loads due to asymmetric separation[R]. NASA-TM-77395, 1984.
    [3] BAARS W J, TINNEY C E, RUF J H, et al. Wall pressure unsteadiness and side loads in overexpanded rocket nozzles[J]. AIAA Journal, 2012, 50(1): 61-73. doi: 10.2514/1.J051075
    [4] HAGEMANN G, IMMICH H, VAN NGUYEN T, et al. Advanced rocket nozzles[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1998, 14(5): 620-634. doi: 10.2514/2.5354
    [5] TAYLOR N V, HEMPSELL C M, MACFARLANE J, et al. Experimental investigation of the evacuation effect in expansion deflection nozzles[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2010, 66(3/4): 550-562.
    [6] FREY M, HAGEMANN G. Critical assessment of dual-bell nozzles[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1999, 15(1): 137-143. doi: 10.2514/2.5402
    [7] HAGEMANN G, TERHARDT M, HAESELER D, et al. Experimental and analytical design verification of the dual-bell concept[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2002, 18(1): 116-122. doi: 10.2514/2.5905
    [8] STARK R, GÉNIN C, SCHNEIDER D, et al. Ariane 5 performance optimization using dual-bell nozzle extension[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2016, 53(4): 743-750. doi: 10.2514/1.A33363
    [9] MEISS J H, BESNARD E. Numerical analysis of curved thrusters for multichamber aerospike engines in flight conditions[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2017, 33(4): 1002-1019. doi: 10.2514/1.B36332
    [10] EMELYANOV V, VOLKOV K, YAKOVCHUK M. Unsteady flow simulation of compressible turbulent flow in dual-bell nozzle with movement of extendible section from its initial to working position[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2022, 194: 514-523. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.10.007
    [11] NÜRNBERGER-GÉNIN C, STARK R. Experimental study on flow transition in dual bell nozzles[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2010, 26(3): 497-502. doi: 10.2514/1.47282
    [12] KBAB H, SELLAM M, HAMITOUCHE T, et al. Design and performance evaluation of a dual bell nozzle[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2017, 130: 52-59. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.10.015
    [13] GENIN C, STARK R H. Side loads in subscale dual bell nozzles[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2011, 27(4): 828-837. doi: 10.2514/1.B34170
    [14] HORN M, FISHER S. Dual-bell altitude compensating nozzles[R]. University Park, US: NASA Propulsion Engineering Research Center, 1993.
    [15] 王一白, 覃粒子, 刘宇, 等. 高度补偿喷管的氢氧热试研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2007, 22(2): 316-322. WANG Yibai, QIN Lizi, LIU Yu, et al. Hydrogen/oxygen hot-firing tests of altitude compensating nozzles[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2007, 22(2): 316-322. (in Chinese

    WANG Yibai, QIN Lizi, LIU Yu, et al. Hydrogen/oxygen hot-firing tests of altitude compensating nozzles[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2007, 22(2): 316-322. (in Chinese)
    [16] 杨建文, 付秀文, 刘亚洲, 等. 不同设计型面对双钟形喷管性能影响[J]. 火箭推进, 2021, 47(5): 14-21. YANG Jianwen, FU Xiuwen, LIU Yazhou, et al. Influence on performance of dual-bell nozzle with different design contours[J]. Journal of Rocket Propulsion, 2021, 47(5): 14-21. (in Chinese

    YANG Jianwen, FU Xiuwen, LIU Yazhou, et al. Influence on performance of dual-bell nozzle with different design contours[J]. Journal of Rocket Propulsion, 2021, 47(5): 14-21. (in Chinese)
    [17] LEGROS B, LEGER L, KOURTA A, et al. Parametrical investigation of transverse injection in a dual-bell nozzle during altitude-varying conditions[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2023, 39(6): 875-885. doi: 10.2514/1.B39077
    [18] ZMIJANOVIC V, LEGER L, SELLAM M, et al. Assessment of transition regimes in a dual-bell nozzle and possibility of active fluidic control[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 82/83: 1-8.
    [19] LÉGER L, ZMIJANOVIC V, SELLAM M, et al. Experimental investigation of forced flow regime transition in a dual bell nozzle by secondary fluidic injection[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2021, 89: 108818. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2021.108818
    [20] FERRERO A, CONTE A, MARTELLI E, et al. Dual-bell nozzle with fluidic control of transition for space launchers[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2022, 193: 130-137. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.12.048
    [21] PROSCHANKA D, YONEZAWA K, KOGA H, et al. Control of operation mode transition in dual-bell nozzles with film cooling[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2012, 28(3): 517-529. doi: 10.2514/1.B34202
    [22] SEMENOV V, IVANOV I, KRYUKOV I. Dual bell slot nozzle of a rocket engine[J]. Perm National Research Polytechnic University Aerospace Engineering Bulletin, 2016(46): 56-72. doi: 10.15593/2224-9982/2016.46.03
    [23] ZUCROW M J, HOFFMAN J D. Gas dynamics: volume 2 multidimensional flow[M]. New York, US: John Wiley and Sons Inc, 1977.
    [24] 刘亚洲, 李钰航, 胡海峰, 等. 延伸段压强分布对双钟形喷管模态转换速率的影响机理[J]. 固体火箭技术, 2024, 47(1): 44-53. LIU Yazhou, LI Yuhang, HU Haifeng, et al. Influence mechanism of wall pressure distribution in extension section on the mode transition rate of dual-bell nozzles[J]. Journal of Solid Rocket Technology, 2024, 47(1): 44-53. (in Chinese

    LIU Yazhou, LI Yuhang, HU Haifeng, et al. Influence mechanism of wall pressure distribution in extension section on the mode transition rate of dual-bell nozzles[J]. Journal of Solid Rocket Technology, 2024, 47(1): 44-53. (in Chinese)
    [25] 刘亚洲, 李平, 陈宏玉, 等. 不同延伸段压力分布的双钟形喷管设计[J]. 航空动力学报, 2022, 37(2): 424-432. LIU Yazhou, LI Ping, CHEN Hongyu, et al. Design of dual-bell nozzles with different extension pressure distributions[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2022, 37(2): 424-432. (in Chinese

    LIU Yazhou, LI Ping, CHEN Hongyu, et al. Design of dual-bell nozzles with different extension pressure distributions[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2022, 37(2): 424-432. (in Chinese)
    [26] TOMITA T, TAKAHASHI M, SASAKI M, et al. Investigation on characteristics of conventional-nozzle-based altitude compensating nozzles by cold-flow tests[R]. AIAA-2006-4375, 2006.
    [27] ANDERSON B H. Assessment of an analytical procedure for predicting supersonic ejector nozzle performance[R]. NASA-TN-D-7601, 1974.
    [28] CIMINI M, MARTELLI E, BERNARDINI M. Numerical analysis of side-loads reduction in a sub-scale dual-bell rocket nozzle[J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2021, 107(3): 551-574. doi: 10.1007/s10494-021-00243-4
    [29] FREY M, HAGEMANN G. Restricted shock separation in rocket nozzles[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2000, 16(3): 478-484. doi: 10.2514/2.5593
    [30] 蔡佳, 李子杰, 黄河峡, 等. 宽速域引射喷管巡航状态流动特性仿真[J]. 火箭推进, 2020, 46(6): 22-29. CAI Jia, LI Zijie, HUANG Hexia, et al. Numerical study on the flow characteristics of ejector nozzle with wide-speed range under cruise state[J]. Journal of Rocket Propulsion, 2020, 46(6): 22-29. (in Chinese

    CAI Jia, LI Zijie, HUANG Hexia, et al. Numerical study on the flow characteristics of ejector nozzle with wide-speed range under cruise state[J]. Journal of Rocket Propulsion, 2020, 46(6): 22-29. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中
图(23) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  758
  • HTML浏览量:  584
  • PDF量:  45
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-05-07
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-10-16

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回