留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

差异化直径刷式密封浮升扰动效应流固耦合数值研究

刘恩宇 孙丹 谭全昌 吴新洲 徐文峰 赵欢

刘恩宇, 孙丹, 谭全昌, 等. 差异化直径刷式密封浮升扰动效应流固耦合数值研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2026, 41(X):20240441 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240441
引用本文: 刘恩宇, 孙丹, 谭全昌, 等. 差异化直径刷式密封浮升扰动效应流固耦合数值研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2026, 41(X):20240441 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240441
LIU Enyu, SUN Dan, TAN Quanchang, et al. Numercal investigation on floating disturbance effect of differential diameter brush seal with fluid-structure coupling[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2026, 41(X):20240441 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240441
Citation: LIU Enyu, SUN Dan, TAN Quanchang, et al. Numercal investigation on floating disturbance effect of differential diameter brush seal with fluid-structure coupling[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2026, 41(X):20240441 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240441

差异化直径刷式密封浮升扰动效应流固耦合数值研究

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240441
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(52075346,52375195); 辽宁省属本科高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助
详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘恩宇(2000-),男,硕士生,主要从事刷式密封刷丝力学特性与摩擦磨损特性研究

    通讯作者:

    孙丹(1981-),男,教授,博士,主要从事航空发动机先进密封技术研究。E-mail:phd_sundan@163.com

  • 中图分类号: V233.5

Numercal investigation on floating disturbance effect of differential diameter brush seal with fluid-structure coupling

  • 摘要:

    传统刷式密封易受气流作用产生浮升扰动效应导致提前失效寿命0过短的问题,基于简化悬臂梁模型理论分析刷丝浮升扰动效应力学模型,提出能够抑制刷丝浮升扰动效应新型差异化直径刷式密封,基于Arbitrary Lagrange-Eulerian(ALE)流固耦合方法建立差异化直径刷式密封三维瞬态求解模型,量化分析刷丝自由端变形特性,研究不同结构参数和工况参数对差异化直径刷式密封浮升扰动效应影响规律。研究结果表明:新型差异化直径刷式密封通过刷丝差异化排列,增大前排刷丝直径进而增加刷丝刚度,能够增强刷丝的抗扰动能力,提升传统刷式密封封严性能。增大压比、前挡板保护高度、前挡板与刷丝束轴向间隙均会增强刷丝的浮升扰动效应,差异化直径刷式密封能够抑制刷丝浮升扰动效应。在本文工况参数和结构参数下,相对于传统刷式密封,新型差异化直径刷式密封刷丝自由端平均变形量减少10.98%~20.39%。

     

  • 图 1  刷式密封刷丝浮升扰动效应

    Figure 1.  Bristles floating disturbance effect of brush seals

    图 2  刷丝浮升扰动效应引发刷丝失效[6]

    Figure 2.  Failure form of bristles floating disturbance effect[6]

    图 3  刷丝浮升扰动效应示意图

    Figure 3.  Bristles floating disturbance effect diagram

    图 4  刷丝受力分析图

    Figure 4.  Bristle force analysis diagram

    图 5  刷丝弯曲变形分析图

    Figure 5.  Bristle bending deformation analysis diagram

    图 6  差异化直径刷式密封结构示意图

    Figure 6.  Differential diameter brush seals structure diagram

    图 7  差异化直径刷式密封数值计算模型

    Figure 7.  Numerical calculation model of differential diameter brush seal

    图 8  网格划分示意图

    Figure 8.  Meshing diagram

    图 9  网格无关性验证

    Figure 9.  Mesh independence verification

    图 10  差异化直径刷式密封边界条件

    Figure 10.  Differential diameter brush seal boundary conditions

    图 11  刷式密封泄漏流动实验装置实物图

    Figure 11.  Brush seal leakage flow experimental device physical diagram

    图 12  刷式密封泄漏特性实验原理图

    Figure 12.  Experimental schematic diagram of brush seal leakage characteristics

    图 13  实验气缸示意图

    Figure 13.  Experimental cylinder schematic diagram

    图 14  泄漏量对比验证

    Figure 14.  Comparison and verification of leakage

    图 15  刷丝变形量对比验证

    Figure 15.  Bristle deformation comparison verification

    图 16  泄漏量随压比变化曲线

    Figure 16.  Variation curve of leakage with pressure ratio

    图 17  刷丝总体变形图(t=0.8 ms)

    Figure 17.  Total deformation diagram of brush seals (t=0.8 ms)

    图 18  刷丝总体变形图(t=1.6 ms)

    Figure 18.  Total deformation diagram of traditional brush seals (t=1.6 ms)

    图 19  前排刷丝排数对刷丝自由端平均变形量影响

    Figure 19.  Influence of the front bristle rows under average deformation of the bristle tips

    图 20  刷丝自由端变形量(pr=3)

    Figure 20.  Deformation of the bristle tips (pr=3)

    图 21  刷丝自由端变形量(pr=4)

    Figure 21.  Deformation of the bristle tips (pr=4)

    图 22  刷丝自由端变形量(pr=5)

    Figure 22.  Deformation of the bristle tips (pr=5)

    图 23  压比对刷丝自由端平均变形量影响

    Figure 23.  Influence of pressure ratio under average deformation of the bristles tips

    图 24  刷丝自由端变形量(L1=3 mm)

    Figure 24.  Deformation of the bristle tips (L1=3 mm)

    图 25  刷丝自由端变形量(L1=4 mm)

    Figure 25.  Deformation of the bristle tips (L1=4 mm)

    图 26  前挡板保护高度对刷丝自由端平均变形量影响

    Figure 26.  Influence of protection height of front plate under average deformation of the bristles tips

    图 27  刷丝自由端变形量(hf=0.76 mm)

    Figure 27.  Deformation of the bristle tips (hf=0.76 mm)

    图 28  刷丝自由端变形量(hf=1.06 mm)

    Figure 28.  Deformation of the bristle tips (hf=1.06 mm)

    图 29  轴向间隙对刷丝自由端平均变形量影响

    Figure 29.  Influence of axial clearance on the average deformation of the bristle tips

    表  1  差异化直径刷式密封结构参数表

    Table  1.   Differential diameter brush seal structure parameter table

    结构参数 数值
    前挡板宽度wf/mm 1.50
    后挡板宽度wb/mm 2.00
    前挡板保护高度L1/mm 2.00,3.00,4.00
    后挡板保护高度L3/mm 1.00
    刷丝束与转子面间隙hr/mm 0
    刷丝束与前挡板间隙hf/mm 0.46,0.76,1.06
    刷丝直径/mm D1 0.07
    D2 0.12
    刷丝间距/mm d1 0.007
    d2 0.021
    d3 0.0136
    刷丝径向长度L2/mm 10.50
    刷丝排数N1 7
    前排刷丝排数N2 2,4,6
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 刘振侠, 江平, 力宁. 航空发动机机械系统设计[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019. LIU Zhenxia, JIANG Ping, LI Ning. Aeroengine mechanical system design[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2019. (in Chinese

    LIU Zhenxia, JIANG Ping, LI Ning. Aeroengine mechanical system design[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2019. (in Chinese)
    [2] 李军, 李志刚, 张元桥, 等. 刷式密封技术的研究进展[J]. 航空发动机, 2019, 45(2): 74-84. LI Jun, LI Zhigang, ZHANG Yuanqiao, et al. Research progress of brush seal technology[J]. Aeroengine, 2019, 45(2): 74-84. (in Chinese

    LI Jun, LI Zhigang, ZHANG Yuanqiao, et al. Research progress of brush seal technology[J]. Aeroengine, 2019, 45(2): 74-84. (in Chinese)
    [3] REGGENTIN P, FRIEDRICHS J. Investigation of brush seal instabilities: AIAA2020-3514 [R]. Los Angeles: AIAA Propulsion and Energy Forum, 2020.
    [4] 孙基生, 孙丹, 赵欢, 等. 刷式密封刷丝浮升效应流固耦合数值研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2024, 39(9): 20220182. SUN Jisheng, SUN Dan, ZHAO Huan, et al. Numerical investigation on bristles buoyancy effect of brush seals with fluid-structure interaction[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2024, 39(9): 20220182. (in Chinese

    SUN Jisheng, SUN Dan, ZHAO Huan, et al. Numerical investigation on bristles buoyancy effect of brush seals with fluid-structure interaction[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2024, 39(9): 20220182. (in Chinese)
    [5] BORGUETA S J, BACH N R, CORREIA J J, et al. Aerodynamic flutter of turbine brush seals[R]. Florida, US: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 2017.
    [6] XU Yiren, MA Ting, KONG Lingcheng, et al. Wear and leakage behaviors of brush seal considering eccentricity and radial deformation[J]. Energies, 2023, 16(8): 3394.
    [7] LIU Yuxin, CHEW J W, PEKRIS M J, et al. The effect of inlet swirl on brush seal bristle deflections and stability[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2020, 142(7): 071002.
    [8] BASU P, DATTA A, LOEWENTHAL R, et al. Hysteresis and bristle stiffening effects in brush seals[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1994, 10(4): 569-575.
    [9] WEI Yuan, RAN Xuhe, XIONG Bin, et al. Influence of brush seal hysteresis effect on the nonlinear characteristics of rotor system[J]. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 2023, 121(3): 107239.
    [10] 张元桥, 闫嘉超, 李军. 刷式密封泄漏和传热特性影响因素的数值研究[J]. 推进技术, 2018, 39(1): 116-124. 耦合数值研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2021, 36(2): 310-319. ZHANG Yuanqiao, YAN Jiachao, LI Jun. Numerical investigations on influence factors of leakage flow and heat transfer characteristics of brush seal[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2018, 39(1): 116-124. (in Chinese

    ZHANG Yuanqiao, YAN Jiachao, LI Jun. Numerical investigations on influence factors of leakage flow and heat transfer characteristics of brush seal[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2018, 39(1): 116-124. (in Chinese)
    [11] 杜宸宇, 孙丹, 刘永泉, 等. 刷式密封吹下效应诱发机理流固耦合数值研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2021, 36(2): 310-319. DU Chenyu, SUN Dan, LIU Yongquan, et al. Numerical investigation on induced mechanism of blow-down effect of brush seals with fluid-structure interaction[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2021, 36(2): 310-319. (in Chinese

    DU Chenyu, SUN Dan, LIU Yongquan, et al. Numerical investigation on induced mechanism of blow-down effect of brush seals with fluid-structure interaction[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2021, 36(2): 310-319. (in Chinese)
    [12] SHORT J, BASU P, DATTA A, et al. Advanced brush seal development: AIAA 1996-2907 [R]. Washington, US: 32nd Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 1996.
    [13] MORRISON M K, WITHERS P A, JONES T V, et al. Brush seal: US5799952[P]. 1998-09-01.
    [14] OUTIRBA B, HENDRICK P. Operating life assessment of a carbon fibre brush seal through endurance testing[J]. Tribology International, 2023, 179: 108076.
    [15] ZHANG Yuanqiao, LI Jun, LI Zhigang, et al. Effect of bristle pack position on the rotordynamic characteristics of brush-labyrinth seals at various operating conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2020, 33(4): 1192-1205.
    [16] 李川, 刘美红, 宋晓磊, 等. 挡板结构对刷式密封泄漏流动特性的影响[J]. 润滑与密封, 2024, 49(2): 115-122. LI Chuan, LIU Meihong, SONG Xiaolei, et al. Effect of plate structure on leakage flow characteristics of brush seals[J]. Lubrication Engineering, 2024, 49(2): 115-122. (in Chinese

    LI Chuan, LIU Meihong, SONG Xiaolei, et al. Effect of plate structure on leakage flow characteristics of brush seals[J]. Lubrication Engineering, 2024, 49(2): 115-122. (in Chinese)
    [17] LI Pengfei, HU Yaping, JI Honghu, et al. Experimental investigation on leakage characteristics of low-hysteresis brush seals[J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2022, 144(7): 071010.
    [18] 迟佳栋, 王之栎. 前板结构对低滞后刷式密封性能影响分析[J]. 航空动力学报, 2012, 27(8): 1902-1906. CHI Jiadong, WANG Zhili. Analysis of front plate’s effect on low hysteresis brush seal[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2012, 27(8): 1902-1906. (in Chinese

    CHI Jiadong, WANG Zhili. Analysis of front plate’s effect on low hysteresis brush seal[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2012, 27(8): 1902-1906. (in Chinese)
    [19] 杨艺潇, 孙丹, 赵欢, 等. 改进型后挡板开孔刷式密封滞后效应与吹下效应数值研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(2): 20230143. YANG Yixiao, SUN Dan, ZHAO Huan, et al. Numerical study on hysteresis effect and blow down effect of improved brush seal structure with through hole on backing plate[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(2): 20230143. (in Chinese

    YANG Yixiao, SUN Dan, ZHAO Huan, et al. Numerical study on hysteresis effect and blow down effect of improved brush seal structure with through hole on backing plate[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(2): 20230143. (in Chinese)
    [20] BERARD G, SHORT J. Influence of design features on brush seal performance: AIAA 1999-2685 [R]. Los Angeles, US: 35th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 1999.
    [21] RUSTAMOV I A, SABIROVA O S, WANG Zixi, et al. Fretting wear behavior and damage mechanisms of inconel X-750 alloy in dry contacts[J]. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 2019(1): 7079819.
  • 加载中
图(29) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  177
  • HTML浏览量:  213
  • PDF量:  33
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-07-02
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-02-12

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回