留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于改进自编码器和TFT的发动机剩余寿命预测模型

谭娜 郭嘉玺 李耀华 石瑞勃 黄金煜昊 雷欣然

谭娜, 郭嘉玺, 李耀华, 等. 基于改进自编码器和TFT的发动机剩余寿命预测模型[J]. 航空动力学报, 2026, 41(2):20240822 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240822
引用本文: 谭娜, 郭嘉玺, 李耀华, 等. 基于改进自编码器和TFT的发动机剩余寿命预测模型[J]. 航空动力学报, 2026, 41(2):20240822 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240822
TAN Na, GUO Jiaxi, LI Yaohua, et al. Aero-engine remaining life prediction model based on improved autoencoder and TFT[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2026, 41(2):20240822 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240822
Citation: TAN Na, GUO Jiaxi, LI Yaohua, et al. Aero-engine remaining life prediction model based on improved autoencoder and TFT[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2026, 41(2):20240822 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240822

基于改进自编码器和TFT的发动机剩余寿命预测模型

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240822
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金委员会与中国民用航空局联合资助(U2033209)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    谭娜(1976-),女,副教授,博士,研究方向为民机的维修大纲与维修方案优化、维修成本分析与控制。E-mail:ntan@cauc.edu.cn

    通讯作者:

    郭嘉玺(1999-),男,硕士生,研究方向为寿命预测、维修决策。E-mail:boboyuminghb@163.com

  • 中图分类号: V263.6

Aero-engine remaining life prediction model based on improved autoencoder and TFT

  • 摘要:

    针对航空发动机多源传感器数据在时变工况下退化特征难表征的问题,提出融合改进型卷积自编码器与temporal fusion transformer(TFT)解码器的预测模型,通过多尺度时空特征融合提升了剩余寿命单点预测精度与时变不确定性量化能力。改进的卷积自编码器利用其多尺度卷积单元(MSCU)从多维传感器时序数据中提取不同尺度下的特征信息,灵活捕获序列中信息间的局部依赖关系,同时避免了信息丢失问题。TFT解码器通过特征选择模块和多头注意力机制有效捕捉了数据中的全局依赖关系,并通过这些机制揭示了特征的重要性,从而提供了对数据特征影响程度的解释。采用公开数据集进行实验验证,与先进预测模型的比较分析表明,MS1DCAE_TFT模型在FD001与FD003数据集上的方均根误差和分数指标至少提高了0.2%和65.5%,同时分位数回归预测了其寿命区间进行了不确定性量化,可为发动机剩余寿命预测提供可靠的解决方案。

     

  • 图 1  模型预测流程

    Figure 1.  Model prediction process

    图 2  两种不同卷积单元示意图

    Figure 2.  Schematic of two different convolutional units

    图 3  归一化后不同子数据集传感器数据图

    Figure 3.  Plot of sensor data for different sub-datasets after normalization

    图 4  不同数据集健康指标趋势图

    Figure 4.  Trends in health indicators for different datasets

    图 5  RUL全周期预测评估图

    Figure 5.  RUL full-cycle forecast assessment chart

    图 6  多步区间预测图

    Figure 6.  Multi-step interval prediction chart

    图 7  不同测试集上寿命预测图

    Figure 7.  Lifetime prediction plots on different test sets

    图 8  传统模型对比可视化

    Figure 8.  Comparative visualization of traditional models

    图 9  测试集上RMSE误差图

    Figure 9.  RMSE error plot on test set

    表  1  14个传感器信息及工况

    Table  1.   14 sensor information and working conditions

    序号 量符号 参数
    1 $ h $ 飞行高度
    2 $ Ma $ 马赫数
    3 $ \alpha $ 油门杆角度
    4 $ {T_{24}} $ 低压压气机出口温度
    5 $ {T_{30}} $ 高压压气机出口温度
    6 $ {T_{50}} $ 低压涡轮出口温度
    7 $ {p_{30}} $ 高压压气机出口总压
    8 $ {N_{\mathrm{f}}} $ 未修正的风扇转速
    9 $ {N_{\mathrm{c}}} $ 未修正的核心机转速
    10 $ \pi_{30} $ 高压压气机出口静压
    11 $ \varphi $ 燃油油量和P30比值
    12 $ N_{\mathrm{rf}} $ 风扇修正转速
    13 $ N_{\mathrm{rc}} $ 核心机修正转速
    14 $ \beta $ 涵道比
    15 $ H_{{\mathrm{bleed}}} $ 引气焓值
    16 $ {W_{31}} $ 高压涡轮冷却空气流量
    17 $ {W_{32}} $ 低压涡轮冷却空气流
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  网络参数设置

    Table  2.   Network parameter setting

    模型 配置 参数
    1DCAE编码器 Conv1_1 [1,8,3,1]
    Conv1_2 [1,8,5,2]
    Conv1_3 [1,8,7,3]
    Cat
    Maxpool1 [2,2,0]
    Conv2 [16,8,3,1]
    Maxpool2 [2,2,0]
    Conv3 [8,1,3,1]
    Fc [3,1]
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  健康指标构建方法对比

    Table  3.   Comparison of health index construction methods

    数据集 D
    PCA CDBN[26] SAE[27] 1DCAE
    FD001 0.8670 0.9527 0.9685 0.9720
    FD003 0.8203 0.8724
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  特征占比

    Table  4.   Percentage of features

    参数 数据集
    FD001 FD003
    发动机ID 81 95 67 71
    飞行高度 0.11 0.09 0.12 0.13
    马赫数 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.10
    油门杆角度 0.03 0.03 0.21 0.23
    健康指标 0.76 0.77 0.56 0.54
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  多步预测特征占比

    Table  5.   Percentage of multi-step prediction features

    参数 数据集
    FD001 FD003
    发动机ID 91 100
    分位数 0.1 0.5 0.9 0.1 0.5 0.9
    飞行高度 0.10 0.12 0.12 0.08 0.10 0.06
    马赫数 0.06 0.11 0.03 0.07 0.11 0.03
    油门杆角度 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.24 0.24 0.26
    健康指标 0.80 0.75 0.84 0.61 0.55 0.65
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6  单步预测方法对比

    Table  6.   Comparison of single-step prediction methods

    方法 FD001 FD003
    RMSE S RMSE S
    CNN-LSTM-SAM[28] 12.56 261.03 13.77 252.92
    MLP[29] 16.8 560.59 18.5 479.85
    DBN[29] 15.2 417.59 14.7 442.43
    MODBNE[29] 15 334.23 12.5 421.91
    LSTM[30] 16.1 338 16.2 852
    MSCNNformer[31] 11.26 251 12.63 724
    MS1DCAEformer 10.14 255.83 12.6 249.78
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  7  多步区间预测方法对比

    Table  7.   Comparison of multi-step interval prediction methods

    方法 $ L $
    FD001 FD003
    ARIMA[32] 21.13 26..19
    CNN-Transformers[33] 16.01 17.35
    MS1DCAEformer 15.62 16.89
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] XU Jiuping, WANG Yusheng, XU Lei. PHM-oriented integrated fusion prognostics for aircraft engines based on sensor data[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2013, 14(4): 1124-1132.
    [2] CHEN Jiaxian, HUANG Ruyi, CHEN Zhuyun, et al. Transfer learning algorithms for bearing remaining useful life prediction: a comprehensive review from an industrial application perspective[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2023, 193: 110239. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110239
    [3] WANG Dong, TSUI K L, MIAO Qiang. Prognostics and health management: a review of vibration based bearing and gear health indicators[J]. IEEE Access, 2017, 6: 665-676.
    [4] 王玺, 胡昌华, 任子强, 等. 基于非线性Wiener过程的航空发动机性能衰减建模与剩余寿命预测[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(2): 223291. WANG Xi, HU Changhua, REN Ziqiang, et al. Performance degradation modeling and remaining useful life prediction for aero-engine based on nonlinear Wiener process[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(2): 223291. (in Chinese

    WANG Xi, HU Changhua, REN Ziqiang, et al. Performance degradation modeling and remaining useful life prediction for aero-engine based on nonlinear Wiener process[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(2): 223291. (in Chinese)
    [5] 裴洪, 胡昌华, 司小胜, 等. 基于机器学习的设备剩余寿命预测方法综述[J]. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(8): 1-13. PEI Hong, HU Changhua, SI Xiaosheng, et al. Review of machine learning based remaining useful life prediction methods for equipment[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 55(8): 1-13. (in Chinese doi: 10.3901/JME.2019.08.001

    PEI Hong, HU Changhua, SI Xiaosheng, et al. Review of machine learning based remaining useful life prediction methods for equipment[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 55(8): 1-13. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3901/JME.2019.08.001
    [6] 刘惠, 刘振宇, 郏维强, 等. 深度学习在装备剩余使用寿命预测技术中的研究现状与挑战[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(1): 34-52. LIU Hui, LIU Zhenyu, JIA Weiqiang, et al. Current research and challenges of deep learning for equipment remaining useful life prediction[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2021, 27(1): 34-52. (in Chinese

    LIU Hui, LIU Zhenyu, JIA Weiqiang, et al. Current research and challenges of deep learning for equipment remaining useful life prediction[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2021, 27(1): 34-52. (in Chinese)
    [7] ZHU Guopeng, ZHU Zening, XIANG Ling, et al. Prediction of bearing remaining useful life based on DACN-ConvLSTM model[J]. Measurement, 2023, 211: 112600. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.112600
    [8] WANG Youdao, ZHAO Yifan, ADDEPALLI S. Practical options for adopting recurrent neural network and its variants on remaining useful life prediction[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 34(1): 69. doi: 10.1186/s10033-021-00588-x
    [9] MA Meng, WANG Zhizhen, ZHONG Zhirong. Transformer encoder enhanced by an adaptive graph convolutional neural network for prediction of aero-engines’ remaining useful life[J]. Aerospace, 2024, 11(4): 289. doi: 10.3390/aerospace11040289
    [10] 严如强, 周峥, 杨远贵, 等. 可解释人工智能在工业智能诊断中的挑战和机遇: 归因解释[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(12): 21-40. YAN Ruqiang, ZHOU Zheng, YANG Yuangui, et al. Challenges and opportunities of XAI in industrial intelligent diagnosis: attribution interpretation[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 60(12): 21-40. (in Chinese

    YAN Ruqiang, ZHOU Zheng, YANG Yuangui, et al. Challenges and opportunities of XAI in industrial intelligent diagnosis: attribution interpretation[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 60(12): 21-40. (in Chinese)
    [11] 李彦夫, 韩特. 基于深度学习的工业装备PHM研究综述[J]. 振动、测试与诊断, 2022, 42(5): 835-847, 1029. LI Yanfu, HAN Te. Deep learning based industrial equipment prognostics and health management: a review[J]. Journal of Vibration, Measurement & Diagnosis, 2022, 42(5): 835-847, 1029. (in Chinese

    LI Yanfu, HAN Te. Deep learning based industrial equipment prognostics and health management: a review[J]. Journal of Vibration, Measurement & Diagnosis, 2022, 42(5): 835-847, 1029. (in Chinese)
    [12] 李天梅, 司小胜, 刘翔, 等. 大数据下数模联动的随机退化设备剩余寿命预测技术[J]. 自动化学报, 2022, 48(9): 2119-2141. LI Tianmei, SI Xiaosheng, LIU Xiang, et al. Data-model interactive remaining useful life prediction technologies for stochastic degrading devices with big data[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2022, 48(9): 2119-2141. (in Chinese

    LI Tianmei, SI Xiaosheng, LIU Xiang, et al. Data-model interactive remaining useful life prediction technologies for stochastic degrading devices with big data[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2022, 48(9): 2119-2141. (in Chinese)
    [13] ZHANG Yongzhi, XIONG Rui, HE Hongwen, et al. Long short-term memory recurrent neural network for remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2018, 67(7): 5695-5705. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2018.2805189
    [14] HUANG Chenggeng, HUANG Hongzhong, LI Yanfeng. A bidirectional LSTM prognostics method under multiple operational conditions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2019, 66(11): 8792-8802. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2019.2891463
    [15] XIANG Feifan, ZHANG Yiming, ZHANG Shuyou, et al. Baye-sian gated-transformer model for risk-aware prediction of aero-engine remaining useful life[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 238: 121859. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121859
    [16] HINTON G E, SALAKHUTDINOV R R. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks[J]. Science, 2006, 313(5786): 504-507. doi: 10.1126/science.1127647
    [17] YE Zijian, ZHANG Qiang, SHAO Siyu, et al. Rolling bearing health indicator extraction and RUL prediction based on multi-scale convolutional autoencoder[J]. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(11): 5747. doi: 10.3390/app12115747
    [18] WANG Chenyang, JIANG Wanlu, YUE Yi, et al. Research on prediction method of gear pump remaining useful life based on DCAE and Bi-LSTM[J]. Symmetry, 2022, 14(6): 1111. doi: 10.3390/sym14061111
    [19] LIM B, ARıK S Ö, LOEFF N, et al. Temporal Fusion Transformers for interpretable multi-horizon time series forecasting[J]. International Journal of Forecasting, 2021, 37(4): 1748-1764. doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.03.012
    [20] VASWANI A, SHAZEER N, PARMAR N, et al. Attention is all you need[J]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017, 30: 13756489.
    [21] SAXENA A, GOEBEL K, SIMON D, et al. Damage propagation modeling for aircraft engine run-to-failure simulation[C]//2008 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management. Piscataway, US: IEEE, 2008: 1-9.
    [22] 李天梅, 司小胜, 张建勋. 多源传感监测线性退化设备数模联动的剩余寿命预测方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(8): 227190. LI Tianmei, SI Xiaosheng, ZHANG Jianxun. Data-model interactive remaining useful life prediction method for multi-sensor monitored linear stochastic degrading devices[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(8): 227190. (in Chinese

    LI Tianmei, SI Xiaosheng, ZHANG Jianxun. Data-model interactive remaining useful life prediction method for multi-sensor monitored linear stochastic degrading devices[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(8): 227190. (in Chinese)
    [23] LI Xiang, DING Qian, SUN Jianqiao. Remaining useful life estimation in prognostics using deep convolution neural networks[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2018, 172: 1-11.
    [24] LIU Bidong, NOWOTARSKI J, HONG Tao, et al. Probabilistic load forecasting via quantile regression averaging on sister forecasts[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2015, 8(2): 730-737.
    [25] ZHANG Bin, ZHANG Lijun, XU Jinwu. Degradation feature selection for remaining useful life prediction of rolling element bearings[J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2016, 32(2): 547-554. doi: 10.1002/qre.1771
    [26] 牟含笑, 郑建飞, 胡昌华, 等. 基于CDBN与BiLSTM的多元退化设备剩余寿命预测[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 325403. MU Hanxiao, ZHENG Jianfei, HU Changhua, et al. Remaining useful life prediction of multivariate degradation equipment based on CDBN and BiLSTM[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(7): 325403. (in Chinese

    MU Hanxiao, ZHENG Jianfei, HU Changhua, et al. Remaining useful life prediction of multivariate degradation equipment based on CDBN and BiLSTM[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(7): 325403. (in Chinese)
    [27] 李浩, 王卓健, 李哲, 等. 基于堆栈自编码器和DeepAR的航空发动机剩余寿命预测[J]. 推进技术, 2022, 43(11): 210645. LI Hao, WANG Zhuojian, LI Zhe, et al. Prediction of remaining useful life of aero-engine based on stacked autoencoder and DeepAR[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2022, 43(11): 210645. (in Chinese

    LI Hao, WANG Zhuojian, LI Zhe, et al. Prediction of remaining useful life of aero-engine based on stacked autoencoder and DeepAR[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2022, 43(11): 210645. (in Chinese)
    [28] LI Jie, JIA Yuanjie, NIU Mingbo, et al. Remaining useful life prediction of turbofan engines using CNN-LSTM-SAM approach[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2023, 23(9): 10241-10251. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3261874
    [29] ZHANG Chong, LIM P, QIN A K, et al. Multiobjective deep belief networks ensemble for remaining useful life estimation in prognostics[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2017, 28(10): 2306-2318. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2582798
    [30] CHEN Chuang, SHI Jiantao, LU Ningyun, et al. Data-driven predictive maintenance strategy considering the uncertainty in remaining useful life prediction[J]. Neurocomputing, 2022, 494: 79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2022.04.055
    [31] 段佳俊, 陆中, 王捷. 基于多尺度CNN和Transformer的航空发动机寿命预测方法[J/OL]. 航空动力学报, (2024-11-19)[2025-03-24]. https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240311. DUAN Jiajun, LU Zhong, WANG Jie. Aero-engine life prediction method based on multi-scale CNN and transformer[J/OL]. Journal of Aerospace Power, (2024-11-19)[2025-03-24]. https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240311. (in Chinese

    DUAN Jiajun, LU Zhong, WANG Jie. Aero-engine life prediction method based on multi-scale CNN and transformer[J/OL]. Journal of Aerospace Power, (2024-11-19)[2025-03-24]. https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20240311. (in Chinese)
    [32] BABU C N, REDDY B E. A moving-average filter based hybrid ARIMA-ANN model for forecasting time series data[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2014, 23: 27-38. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.05.028
    [33] LIU Wei, LIN Yiyuan, LIU Weijia, et al. An attention-based multiscale transformer network for remote sensing image change detection[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2023, 202: 599-609. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2023.07.001
  • 加载中
图(9) / 表(7)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  595
  • HTML浏览量:  610
  • PDF量:  30
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-12-05
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-08-07

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回