留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

仿蜻蜓翅翼褶皱流形的扩压叶栅流动控制技术

郭重佳 杨旭东 韩吉昂 韩少冰 钟兢军

郭重佳, 杨旭东, 韩吉昂, 等. 仿蜻蜓翅翼褶皱流形的扩压叶栅流动控制技术[J]. 航空动力学报, 2026, 41(X):20250584 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20250584
引用本文: 郭重佳, 杨旭东, 韩吉昂, 等. 仿蜻蜓翅翼褶皱流形的扩压叶栅流动控制技术[J]. 航空动力学报, 2026, 41(X):20250584 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20250584
GUO Chongjia, YANG Xudong, HAN Ji’ang, et al. Flow control technology for diffuser cascades inspired by dragonfly wing corrugation structures[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2026, 41(X):20250584 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20250584
Citation: GUO Chongjia, YANG Xudong, HAN Ji’ang, et al. Flow control technology for diffuser cascades inspired by dragonfly wing corrugation structures[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2026, 41(X):20250584 doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20250584

仿蜻蜓翅翼褶皱流形的扩压叶栅流动控制技术

doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20250584
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金重点项目(52236005); 航空发动机及燃气轮机基础科学中心重点项目(P2022-B-Ⅱ-007-001)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    郭重佳(1996-),男,博士生,主要从事压气机流动控制技术研究。E-mail:guo_chongjia@163.com

    通讯作者:

    韩吉昂(1979-),男,教授,博士,主要从事叶轮机械气动热力学研究。E-mail: hja@dlmu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: V231.3

Flow control technology for diffuser cascades inspired by dragonfly wing corrugation structures

  • 摘要:

    借鉴蜻蜓翅翼褶皱结构调控气流的仿生设计理念,提出一种沿流向阵列布置的非光滑表面结构,并将其应用于高负荷扩压叶栅。采用经实验验证的数值模拟方法,系统研究了沟槽位置参数与结构参数对叶栅气动性能的影响规律,并从宏观流场特征与近壁流动机理角度揭示其作用机制。结果表明:当沟槽布置于叶片吸力面75% ~100%轴向弦长范围内并采用合理的结构参数组合时,沟槽腔体内可形成稳定的驻留涡结构。该驻留涡通过与主流之间的周期性交换,在近壁区引入受限幅值的小尺度扰动,提高湍流间歇因子而未诱发高能量的大尺度湍动结构;同时,其对回流动量的局部滞留与重新分配作用,使分离区由高能不稳定状态向较为温和的受控湍化状态转变。由此,近尾缘吸力面分离涡结构得到显著削弱,通道堵塞程度降低,吸力面边界层发展状态得到有效改善。基于2倍设计点损失准则,在可用进气角范围内叶栅总压损失最大减小8.66%,且可用进气角右边界向高攻角方向拓展约 0.7°。

     

  • 图 1  叶栅结构示意图

    Figure 1.  Blade profile diagram

    图 2  蜻蜓翅翼横截面的流向褶皱结构

    Figure 2.  Flow fold structure of dragonfly wing cross-section

    图 3  仿生沟槽表面

    Figure 3.  Bionic groove surface

    图 4  计算网格与壁面y+分布

    Figure 4.  Computational grid and y+ distribution

    图 5  网格无关性验证

    Figure 5.  Grid independence verification

    图 6  仿生沟槽局部流场

    Figure 6.  Bionic groove local flow field

    图 7  进口段长度对叶栅损失的影响

    Figure 7.  Influence of inlet section length on cascade loss

    图 8  叶栅出口总压损失系数分布

    Figure 8.  Distribution of outlet total pressure loss coefficient

    图 9  叶栅出口节距平均气流角展向分布[31]

    Figure 9.  Span-wise distribution of pitch-averaged flow angle[31]

    图 10  油流试验流迹及极限流线分布[31]

    Figure 10.  Distribution of oil flow and limit streamline[31]

    图 11  实验与仿真总压损失系数攻角特性[32]

    Figure 11.  Experimental and simulation total pressure loss coefficient intake angle characteristics[32]

    图 12  沟槽流向起始位置对叶栅损失的影响

    Figure 12.  Effect of groove streamwise starting position on cascade loss

    图 13  沟槽结构参数对叶栅损失的影响规律

    Figure 13.  Influence of groove structure parameters on cascade loss

    图 14  沟槽倒圆角位置对叶栅性能的影响

    Figure 14.  Influence of groove fillet position on cascade performance

    图 15  沟槽倒圆角半径对叶栅损失的影响规律

    Figure 15.  Influence of groove fillet radius on cascade loss

    图 16  叶栅出口总压损失系数云图

    Figure 16.  Contour of total pressure loss coefficient at the outlet

    图 17  节距平均总压损失系数的径向分布

    Figure 17.  Radial distribution of pitch-averaged total pressure loss coefficient

    图 18  吸力面、端壁极限流线、通道截面上二维速度流线和轴向涡量云图

    Figure 18.  Suction surface, endwall limit streamline, and two-dimensional velocity streamline and axial vorticity contour of passage section

    图 19  总压损失系数流向分布规律

    Figure 19.  Flow distribution curve of total pressure loss coefficient

    图 20  低能流体团、湍流动能及静压系数分布

    Figure 20.  Distribution of low-energy fluid regions, turbulent kinetic energy, and static pressure coefficient

    图 21  局部叶高总压损失系数云图

    Figure 21.  Contour of total pressure loss coefficient at local blade span section

    图 22  局部叶高马赫数云图

    Figure 22.  Contour of Mach number at local blade span section

    图 23  局部叶高二维流线拓扑结构

    Figure 23.  Local blade span 2D streamline topology structure

    图 24  湍流间歇因子、湍流动能、无量纲速度云图及速度流线

    Figure 24.  Turbulent intermittent factor, turbulent kinetic energy, dimensionless velocity contour, and velocity streamline

    图 25  边界层参数流向分布曲线

    Figure 25.  Boundary layer parameter flow distribution curve

    图 26  叶片壁面摩擦因数

    Figure 26.  Friction coefficient of blade wall

    图 27  壁面摩擦因数与沟槽内三维涡结构

    Figure 27.  Wall friction coefficient and three-dimensional vortex structure inside ribs

    图 28  总压损失系数进气角特性

    Figure 28.  Total pressure loss coefficient intake angle characteristics

    表  1  叶型参数

    Table  1.   Blade profile parameters

    设计参数数值
    弦长 C/mm40
    轴向弦长 Ca/mm36.95
    节距 t/mm22
    进口气流角 βin/(°)42
    出口气流角βout/(°)90
    进口马赫数 Main0.67
    进口雷诺数 Rec560000
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 梁作召, 孙鹏, 李晓东, 等. 端壁自适应射流出口位置对高速扩压叶栅角区分离的影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(3): 20230325. LIANG Zuozhao, SUN Peng, LI Xiaodong, et al. Effects of outlet position on corner separation of high speed compressor cascade with endwall self-adaptive injection[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(3): 20230325. (in Chinese doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20230325

    LIANG Zuozhao, SUN Peng, LI Xiaodong, et al. Effects of outlet position on corner separation of high speed compressor cascade with endwall self-adaptive injection[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(3): 20230325. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20230325
    [2] WALSH M J. Riblets as a viscous drag reduction technique[J]. AIAA Journal, 1983, 21(4): 485-486. doi: 10.2514/3.60126
    [3] WALSH M, LINDEMANN A. Optimization and application of riblets for turbulent drag reduction: AIAA1984-347 [R]. Reno, US: AIAA, 1984.
    [4] BACHER E, SMITH C. A combined visualization-anemometry study of the turbulent drag reducing mechanisms of triangular micro-groove surface modifications: AIAA1985-548 [R]. Boulder, US: AIAA, 1985.
    [5] CHOI H, MOIN P, KIM J. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over riblets[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1993, 255: 503-539. doi: 10.1017/S0022112093002575
    [6] BECHERT D W, BRUSE M, HAGE W, et al. Experiments on drag-reducing surfaces and their optimization with an adjustable geometry[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1997, 338: 59-87. doi: 10.1017/s0022112096004673
    [7] BOOMSMA A, SOTIROPOULOS F. Direct numerical simulation of sharkskin denticles in turbulent channel flow[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2016, 28(3): 035106. doi: 10.1063/1.4942474
    [8] 李育斌, 乔志德, 王志歧. 运七飞机外表面沟纹膜减阻的实验研究[J]. 气动实验与测量控制, 1995(3): 21-26. LI Yubin, QIAO Zhide, WANG Zhiqi. An experimental research of drag reduction using riblets for the Y-7 airplane[J]. Aerodynamic Experiment and Measurement & Control, 1995(3): 21-26. (in Chinese

    LI Yubin, QIAO Zhide, WANG Zhiqi. An experimental research of drag reduction using riblets for the Y-7 airplane[J]. Aerodynamic Experiment and Measurement & Control, 1995(3): 21-26. (in Chinese)
    [9] ZHANG Peng, DU Junping, LI Yonghong. Delay of airfoil stall via bio-inspired herringbone groove array[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2025, 38(8): 103527. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2025.103527
    [10] 王春光, 尤军锋, 许桂阳, 等. 环形通道中湍流减阻技术及其机理研究[J]. 导弹与航天运载技术, 2018(6): 30-37. WANG Chunguang, YOU Junfeng, XU Guiyang, et al. Research on turbulent drag reduction and mechanism of annuli[J]. Missiles and Space Vehicles, 2018(6): 30-37. (in Chinese doi: 10.7654/j.issn.1004-7182.20180606

    WANG Chunguang, YOU Junfeng, XU Guiyang, et al. Research on turbulent drag reduction and mechanism of annuli[J]. Missiles and Space Vehicles, 2018(6): 30-37. (in Chinese) doi: 10.7654/j.issn.1004-7182.20180606
    [11] LI Zhihui, DU Juan, ZHANG Hongwu. Physical mechanisms investigation of sharkskin-inspired compressor cascade based on large eddy simulations[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2021, 143(6): 061005. doi: 10.1115/1.4050147
    [12] MA Hongwei, WEI Wei. Experimental investigation of effects of distributed riblets on aerodynamic performance of a low-speed compressor[J]. Journal of Thermal Science, 2013, 22(6): 592-599. doi: 10.1007/s11630-013-0667-1
    [13] 孙鹏, 孙洁, 傅文广. 基于蜻蜓翅翼仿生结构的流动减阻研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(7): 20230048. SUN Peng, SUN Jie, FU Wenguang. Research on flow drag reduction based on the bionic structure of dragonfly wings[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(7): 20230048. (in Chinese doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20230048

    SUN Peng, SUN Jie, FU Wenguang. Research on flow drag reduction based on the bionic structure of dragonfly wings[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(7): 20230048. (in Chinese) doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20230048
    [14] 陈应龙. 蜻蜓翅膀微结构与力学行为的仿生分析研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2012. CHEN Yinglong. BionicResearch on the relation between the multi-scaled structure and mechanical behavior of dragonfly wing[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2012. (in Chinese

    CHEN Yinglong. BionicResearch on the relation between the multi-scaled structure and mechanical behavior of dragonfly wing[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2012. (in Chinese)
    [15] MA He, GONG Peiyi, TIAN Yuqiang, et al. HiFly-dragon: a dragonfly inspired flapping flying robot with modified, resonant, direct-driven flapping mechanisms[J]. Drones, 2024, 8(4): 126. doi: 10.3390/drones8040126
    [16] MASUD M H, FAISAL A K M, ALAM M M, et al. Corrugated airfoils for enhanced low-speed aerodynamics: a bio-inspired review[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2025, 37(8): 085120. doi: 10.1063/5.0278666
    [17] WOOTTON R. Functional morphology of insect wings[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 1992, 37: 113-140. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.000553
    [18] BUCKHOLZ R H. The functional role of wing corrugations in living systems[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1986, 108(1): 93-97. doi: 10.1115/1.3242550
    [19] WAKELING J M, ELLINGTON C P. Dragonfly flight: I. gliding flight and steady-state aerodynamic forces[J]. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1997, 200(3): 543-556. doi: 10.1242/jeb.200.3.543
    [20] KESEL A B. Aerodynamic characteristics of dragonfly wing sections compared with technical aerofoils[J]. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 2000, 203(20): 3125-3135. doi: 10.1242/jeb.203.20.3125
    [21] TAMAI M, WANG Zhijian, RAJAGOPALAN G, et al. Aerodynamic performance of a corrugated dragonfly airfoil compared with smooth airfoils at low Reynolds numbers[C]//Proceedings of the 45th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit: Reno, US: AIAA, 2013: 8-11.
    [22] LIU Huixiang, HE Guoyi, MA Chengyu, et al. A computational study of the aerodynamic performance of a dragonfly forewing in gliding flight[J]. MATEC Web of Conferences, 2018, 151: 03001. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201815103001
    [23] PANNEER S P, JINI R R, PUGHALENDI M. Computational analysis of a corrugated dragonfly airfoil at low Reynolds number[J]. International Journal for Research in Engineering Application & Management, 2021, 6(11): 148-153. doi: 10.61463/ijset.vol.12.issue2.128
    [24] 罗云, 何国毅, 王琦, 等. 褶皱结构对蜻蜓后翅的气动特性影响分析[J]. 航空工程进展, 2019, 10(3): 355-362. LUO Yun, HE Guoyi, WANG Qi, et al. Aerodynamic effects of corrugation on dragonfly hindwing[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2019, 10(3): 355-362. (in Chinese

    LUO Yun, HE Guoyi, WANG Qi, et al. Aerodynamic effects of corrugation on dragonfly hindwing[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2019, 10(3): 355-362. (in Chinese)
    [25] 徐文峰, 孙鹏, 杨国刚. 机匣仿生顶室对压气机间隙流动影响研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2021, 42(9): 2275-2283. XU Wenfeng, SUN Peng, YANG Guogang. Effect of casing with bionic tip chamber on compressor clearance flow[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2021, 42(9): 2275-2283. (in Chinese

    XU Wenfeng, SUN Peng, YANG Guogang. Effect of casing with bionic tip chamber on compressor clearance flow[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2021, 42(9): 2275-2283. (in Chinese)
    [26] 徐文峰, 孙鹏, 杨国刚. 仿生翅室对跨声速扩压叶栅角区分离流动影响研究[J]. 推进技术, 2022, 43(5): 200766. XU Wenfeng, SUN Peng, YANG Guogang. Effects of bionic chamber on corner separation flow in a transonic compressor cascade[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2022, 43(5): 200766. (in Chinese

    XU Wenfeng, SUN Peng, YANG Guogang. Effects of bionic chamber on corner separation flow in a transonic compressor cascade[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2022, 43(5): 200766. (in Chinese)
    [27] XU Wenfeng, SUN Peng, YANG Guogang. Effect of the bionic chamber position on the aerodynamic performance in a transonic compressor cascade[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 119: 107106. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.107106
    [28] VARGAS A, MITTAL R, DONG Haibo. A computational study of the aerodynamic performance of a dragonfly wing section in gliding flight[J]. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2008, 3(2): 026004. doi: 10.1088/1748-3182/3/2/026004
    [29] CELIK I B, GHIA U, ROACHE P J, et al. Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2008, 130(7): 078001. doi: 10.1115/1.2960953
    [30] CHEN Pingping, QIAO Weiyang, LIESNER K, et al. Location effect of boundary layer suction on compressor hub-corner separation: ASME Paper GT2014-25043[R] Düsseldorf, Germany: ASME, 2014.
    [31] HERGT A, MEYER R, LIESNER K, et al. A new approach for compressor endwall contouring[C] Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. Vancouver, Canada: ASME, 2011: 177-186.
    [32] HAGE W, MEYER R, PASCHEREIT C. Control of secondary flow in a high loaded compressor stage by means of a groove structure on the sidewalls: AIAA2007-4278[R]. Miami, US: AIAA, 2007.
    [33] KÖLLER U, MÖNIG R, KÜSTERS B, et al. Development of advanced compressor airfoils for heavy-duty gas turbines: part I design and optimization[J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2000, 122(3): 397-405. doi: 10.1115/1.1302296
  • 加载中
图(28) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  206
  • HTML浏览量:  142
  • PDF量:  9
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-12-15
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-02-15

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回