单边膨胀喷管试验和数值模拟
Experimental and computational investigation of single-expansion-ramp-nozzle
-
摘要: 在落压比为4~60范围内,对两种不同膨胀型面的高速二元单边膨胀喷管模型试验件(SERN 1和SERN 2)进行了试验研究,获得了壁面静压分布和纹影照片.用三维数值计算得到了喷管性能参数,丰富了流场信息.试验和数值模拟结果表明:下腹板出口气流处于深度过膨胀状态时,喷管内部激波/边界层相互干扰并存在4~5道斜激波,而且SERN 1和SERN 2内部分别出现了自由激波分离和受限激波分离,这使得上膨胀面压力分布和喷管总体性能差别较大.两个模型在设计点附近总体性能差别较小,在设计点轴向推力系数可达0.96,推力矢量角约为9°;在低落比范围内,喷管性能变化较大而且两者差别明显;总体上来说,SERN 2性能优于SERN 1.Abstract: An experimental study was conducted for two high-speed two-dimensional(2-D) single-expansion-ramp-nozzles with different ramp contours at nozzle pressure ratios Rnp between 4 and 60 under wind off condition.The wall static pressure distributions and schlieren flow visualization were obtained.A computational investigation was also conducted to determine the performance of the nozzle and enrich the details of flowfield.Results from this study indicate that under highly overexpanded conditions of cowl trailing edge,the inner nozzle flow is dominated by shock-induced boundary-layer separation and accompanied by four to five oblique shocks.Moreover,the free shock and restricted shock separation are identified respectively in SERN 1 and SERN 2,which exert large influence on the wall pressure distributions and overall performance of nozzles.The performance of two models has little difference in the vicinity of design point,the axial thrust coefficient reaches 0.96 and thrust vector angle is about 9 degrees at the design point.Through the low Rnp regime,the performance of nozzles show large variation and the difference is obvious between SERN 1 and SERN 2.In general,the performance of SERN 2 is superior to SERN 1.
-
[1] Spaid F W,Keener E R,Hui F C L.Experimental results for a hypersonic nozzle/afterbody flow field .AIAA 1992-3915,1992. [2] Capone F J,Re R J,Bare E A.Parametric investigation of single-expansion-ramp nozzles at Mach numbers from 0.60 to 1.20 .NASA TP-3240,1992. [3] Ruffin S M,Venkatapathy E,Keener E R,et al.Hypersonic single expansion ramp nozzle simulations[J].Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets,1992,29(2):749-755. [4] Huebner L D,Witte D W.Exhaust simulation testing of a hypersonic airbreathing model at transonic speeds .AIAA 2003-7001,2003. [5] Engblom W A.Numerical prediction of SERN performance using WIND code .AIAA 2003-4410,2003. [6] 李念,张堃元,徐惊雷.二元非对称喷管数值模拟与验证[J].航空动力学报,2004,19(6):802-805. LI Nian,ZHANG Kunyuan,XU Jinglei.Simulation and experiment validation of a two dimensional asymmetric ramp nozzle[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2004,19(6):802-805.(in Chinese) [7] 周正,倪鸿礼,贺旭照,等.基于Rao方法的二维单壁膨胀喷管优化设计[J].推进技术,2009,30(4):451-456. ZHOU Zheng,NI Hongli,HE Xuzhao,et al.Optimization design of single expansion ramp nozzle based on Rao's method[J].Journal of Propulsion Technology,2009,30(4):451-456.(in Chinese) [8] 张堃元,张荣学,徐辉.非对称大膨胀比喷管研究[J].推进技术,2001,22(5):380-382. ZHANG Kunyuan,ZHANG Rongxue,XU Hui.Investigation of single expansion ramp nozzle[J].Journal of Propulsion Technology,2001,22(5):380-382.(in Chinese) [9] 谭杰,金捷,杜刚,等.过膨胀单边膨胀喷管试验和数值模拟研究[J].推进技术,2009,30(3):292-296. TAN Jie,JIN Jie,DU Gang,et al.Experimental and computational investigation of a over-expanded single-expansion-ramp nozzle[J].Journal of Propulsion Technology,2009,30(3):292-296.(in Chinese) [10] Sebastién D,Nguyen A T.Unsteady side loads in a thrust-optimized contour nozzle at hysteresis regime[J].AIAA Journal,2004,42(9):1878-1888. [11] Shimizu T,Miyajima H,Kodera M.Numerical study of restricted shock separation in a compressed truncated perfect nozzle[J].AIAA Journal,2006,44(3):576-584. [12] Verma S B,Haidn O.Study of restricted shock separation phenomena in a thrust optimized parabolic nozzle[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power,2009,25(5):1046-1057.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1597
- HTML浏览量: 4
- PDF量: 21
- 被引次数: 0